Chhattisgarh High Court
CONT/191/2024 of ANUP KUMAR AGRAWAL Vs VINAY KUMAR LANGEH (IAS) on 10 September 2026
2026:CGHC:39856 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 191 of 2024 1 - Anup Kumar Agrawal S/o Shri Nand Kishore Agrawal Aged About 40 Years R/o Agrawal City, Mahalpara, Baikunthpur, District - Koriya, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner Versus 1 - Vinay Kumar Langeh (Ias) Posted
CGHC010037352024
2026:CGHC:39856
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CONT No. 191 of 2024
1 - Anup Kumar Agrawal S/o Shri Nand Kishore Agrawal Aged About 40 Years R/o Agrawal City, Mahalpara, Baikunthpur, District - Koriya, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner
Versus
1 - Vinay Kumar Langeh (Ias) Posted And Working As Collector Koriya, District - Koriya, (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh. (Contemnors)
2 - Sharad Kumar Satpati Posted And Working As Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Koriya Division, Manendragarh, District - Koriya, (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Shishir Dixit, Advocate
For Respondents
:
Mr. D.K. Gwalre, Advocate
SB:
Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
ORDER ON BOARD
11/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 215 of the Constitution of India r/w. Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 alleging non-compliance of the order dated 29.05.2023 passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 2464/2023.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 29.05.2023 subject matter of contempt, has been complied with.
3. In view of the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, I do not find any good ground to continue with the contempt petition.
4. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings initiated against the respondents is dropped. Notices issued to the respondents stands discharged.
5. Contempt petition is closed. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY