Chhattisgarh High Court
MCRC/8367/2026 of SHIVA SAHU Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 8 September 2026
2026:CGHC:39547 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 8367 of 2026 Shiva Sahu S/o Tikaram Sahu Aged About 23 Years R/o Raikona Police Station Sarsiwan District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Applicant Versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station - Sarsiwan, District
CGHC010346382026
2026:CGHC:39547
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRC No. 8367 of 2026
Shiva Sahu S/o Tikaram Sahu Aged About 23 Years R/o Raikona Police Station Sarsiwan District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station - Sarsiwan, District - Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Non-applicant
For Applicant
:
Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate.
For Non-Applicant
:
Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Government Advocate.
SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD
09/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is the first bail application filed by the applicant under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 208/2024 registered at Police Station – Sarsiwan, District - Sarangarh - Bilaigarh Chhattisgarh for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 409 r/w Section 149, 120(B), 34 of the of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 10 of the Protection of interest of depositors Act, 2005, Section 3 of the Prize Chit and
Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 is in violation of the provisions of Section 4 of the said act and section 3 and 21 of violation of the provisions of the Unregulated Deposit Schemes (Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes) Act, 2019.
2. Learned counsel for the State submits that the applicant has not disclosed all the criminal antecedents of the applicant in the bail application.
3. At this stage, learned counsel for applicant submits that in view of objection as raised by learned State counsel, he may be permitted to withdraw this application with liberty to file fresh application.
4. In view of above, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
5. Registry is directed to return the certified copies of the impugned orders/documents after obtaining photocopies thereof.
Sd/-Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge vaibhav