Chhattisgarh High Court
MCRC/8232/2026 of LAXMAN RAJPUT Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 7 September 2026
2026:CGHC:39401 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 8232 of 2026 Laxman Rajput S/o Suresh Singh Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Baghamara P.S. Gunderdehi, District Balod (C.G.) ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through -Police Station Gunderdehi, District Balod
CGHC010342822026
2026:CGHC:39401
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRC No. 8232 of 2026
Laxman Rajput S/o Suresh Singh Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Baghamara P.S. Gunderdehi, District Balod (C.G.)
... Applicant
versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through -Police Station Gunderdehi, District Balod (C.G.)
... Respondent
For Applicant
:
Shri Vikas Kumar Pandey, Advocate.
For
Respondent/State
:
Dr. Surendra Dewangan, PL.
SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 08/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.94/2026 registered at Police Station Gunderdehi, District Balod (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 309(6) of
B.N.S.
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 05/03/2026 at about 1 pm the applicant along with co-accused persons have abused and assaulted the complainant party by means of hands and fist and on the point of knife have robbed gold and silver ornaments like ring and chain as also snatched Rs.8300/- cash. The incident was reported and based on the aforementioned allegations offence was registered and applicant was arrested on 07/03/2026.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the crime. He would submit that out of five co-accused persons, four co-accused persons have been enlarged on bail and case of the applicant is also on the similar footing. He would submit that the applicant is in jail since 07/03/2026 and conclusion of trial may take some time, hence, he be enlarged on bail.
4. On the other hand, learned State counsel would oppose the submission of learned counsel for the applicant and he would submit that the case of the applicant is different to that of the other co-accused persons who have been enlarged on bail. He submits that there are two other criminal antecedents registered against the applicant in the same police station bearing crime number 217/2025 and 232/2025.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials available on record.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, submission of learned counsel for the parties, materials available on record, considering the fact that the applicant has not disclosed the offences as stated by learned counsel for the State, I do not find present to be a fit case to allow this application.
7. Accordingly, the bail application filed on behalf of the applicant is dismissed. Sd/-
(Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge
gouri