Chhattisgarh High Court
FA(MAT)/130/2025 of SMT. ANITA PANDE Vs SHRI SUMEET RAMKISHOR PANDE on 7 September 2026
2026:CGHC:39331- DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA(MAT) No. 130 of 2025 • Smt. Anita Pande W/o Sumeet Ramkishor Pande Aged About 33 Years R/o. C/o. Ramsuman Tiwari, Street No. 27, Q.No. 3c, Sector- 11, Zone 02 Khursipar-Bhilai, Tahsil And District- Durg, Chhattisgarh
CGHC010141582025
2026:CGHC:39331-
DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
FA(MAT) No. 130 of 2025
•
Smt. Anita Pande W/o Sumeet Ramkishor Pande Aged About 33
Years R/o. C/o. Ramsuman Tiwari, Street No. 27, Q.No. 3c, Sector- 11, Zone 02 Khursipar-Bhilai, Tahsil And District- Durg, Chhattisgarh
... Appellant(s)
versus
•
Shri Sumeet Ramkishor Pande Aged About 36 Years Occu. B.H.M.S.
R/o. Maskasath Telipura, Near of Dayaram Akhada, Itwari, Nagpur (Maharastra) Mo. 9730036552
... Respondent(s)
For Appellant(s)
: None.
For Respondent(s)
: Mr. Shyam Kumar, Advocate
D.B. : Hon’ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Hon’ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge 08/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. None appeared nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellant even in the second round of hearing.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that subsequent to filing of this appeal, the parties have filed an application under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, which was allowed and the marriage between the parties has been dissolved by the judgment and decree dated 11.03.2026, passed by the First Additional Principle Judge, Family Court, Durg (C.G.) in Civil Suit No.1008/2025 and copy of the judgment and decree dated 11.03.2026 is placed on record by covering memo for consideration of this Court.
3. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent and also the impugned judgment and decree, against which the present appeal preferred, is on an application under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, hence, nothing survives in this appeal for adjudication by this Court. Accordingly, the instant appeal deserves to be and is hereby dismissed.
4. No cost. Sd/- Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal)
Judge Judge Vaishali