Chhattisgarh High Court
CONT/1091/2026 of M/S RAMGOPAL SOMANI Vs BRIJESH SINGH KSHATRIYA on 6 September 2026
2026:CGHC:39234 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1091 of 2026 1 - M/s Ramgopal Somani Through Power Of Attorney Holder Varun Somani, Aged About 39, Years, S/o Shri Ramgopal Somani, Designated As Partner In M/s Ramgopal Samani, At Station Road, Champa District Janjgir
CGHC010287112026
2026:CGHC:39234
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CONT No. 1091 of 2026
1 - M/s Ramgopal Somani Through Power Of Attorney Holder Varun Somani, Aged About 39, Years, S/o Shri Ramgopal Somani, Designated As Partner In M/s Ramgopal Samani, At Station Road, Champa District Janjgir Champa C.G.
... Petitioner
Versus
1 - Brijesh Singh Kshatriya Presently Posted As Commissioner, At Municpal Corporation Raigarh, District Raigarh, C.G. Pin 496001.
... Respondent
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Akash Mishra, Advocate
For Respondent
:
Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate
SB:
Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
ORDER ON BOARD
07/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 215 of the Constitution of India r/w. Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 alleging non-compliance of the order dated 31.01.2025 passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 653/2025.
2. Learned counsel for the Respondent submit that the order dated 31.01.2025 has been complied with.
3. The submission of counsel for the Respondent is not opposed by the counsel for petitioner. He however, submits that he may be granted liberty to file appropriate proceedings in any exigency arises in future.
4. In view of the submissions made by counsel for the parties, I do not find any good ground to continue with the contempt petition.
5. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings initiated against the respondents is dropped. Notices issued to the respondents stands discharged.
6. Contempt petition is closed. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY