Chhattisgarh High Court
WPCR/517/2026 of HIMANSHU RATHI Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 6 September 2026
2026:CGHC:39260-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 517 of 2026 1 - Himanshu Rathi S/o Jogendra Rathi Aged About 29 Years R/o H D D 260 Lane No. 3, Near J.P. Chowk, Kabirnagar, Tatibandh, P.S. Khamtarai, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Gurjeet Singh S/o Balwant Singh
CGHC010338992026
2026:CGHC:39260-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPCR No. 517 of 2026
1 - Himanshu Rathi S/o Jogendra Rathi Aged About 29 Years R/o H D D 260
Lane No. 3, Near J.P. Chowk, Kabirnagar, Tatibandh, P.S. Khamtarai, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Gurjeet Singh S/o Balwant Singh Aged About 41 Years R/o L I G 116, Opposite A.I.I.M.S. Hospital, G.E. Road, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
... Petitioners
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Singhoda, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 2 - Mohammad Mohsin Sheikh S/o Mohammad Shafique Sheikh R/o Near Jai Stambh Chowk, Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh
... Respondents
(Cause title taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioners
:
Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate
For Respondent No.1/State
:
Mr. Praveen Das, Additional Advocate
General
Hon'ble
S hri
Parth Prateem Sahu
, Judge
Hon'ble
Shri R
avindra Kumar Agrawal
, Judge
Order on Board
Per
Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
07/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to repeat the prayer if any exigency arises in future.
2. The submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the State counsel.
3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Judge ved