Chhattisgarh High Court
MCC/829/2026 of LEKH RAM SAHU Vs SAMRESH ASHISH BENARJI on 2 September 2026
2026:CGHC:39091
2026:CGHC:39091 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 829 of 2026 1 - Lekh Ram Sahu Son Of Ganpat Ram Sahu, Aged About 42 Years Resident Of Ward No.01, Asiwara, Kranti Chowk, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 2 - Khilendra Sahu Son Of Lekh Ram Sahu, Aged About 21 Years Resident Of
CGHC010320002026
2026:CGHC:39091
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCC No. 829 of 2026
1 - Lekh Ram Sahu Son Of Ganpat Ram Sahu, Aged About 42 Years Resident Of Ward No.01, Asiwara, Kranti Chowk, Durg, District Durg
(C.G.)
2 - Khilendra Sahu Son Of Lekh Ram Sahu, Aged About 21 Years Resident Of Ward No.01, Asiwara, Kranti Chowk, Durg, District Durg
(C.G.)
3 - Ku. Dipika Sahu, Daughter Of Lakh Ram Sahu, Aged About 19 Years Resident Of Ward No.01, Asiwara, Kranti Chowk, Durg, District Durg
(C.G.)
... Petitioner
versus
1 - Samresh Ashish Benarji Son Of Late A.K. Benarji Aged About 42
Years Resident Of Gandhi Nagar,, Bhilai -3, District Durg Raipur (C.G.)
(Driver And Owner Of Offending Vehicle Indica Vista Vista No. C.G.07, M.B. 1372) District Durg Chhattisgarh 2 - Manager The New India Insurance Company Ltd. Chouhan Estate Supela, Bhilai, District Durg Raipur (C.G.) (Wrongly Mentioned Owner )
(Inaurer Of Offending Vehicle Indica Vista Vista No. C.G.07, M.B. 1372)
District Durg Chhattisgarh
... Respondents
[Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant :
Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order
on Board
. 09 .202
1. Heard on IA No.01, which is an application filed under Section 05 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of delay of 2 days in filing the present restoration application (MCC). SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN
Page 1 of 2
2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, I am of considered opinion that the applicant has shown sufficient cause in filing this restoration application (MCC) with a delay of 02 days and, accordingly, the same is liable to be condoned.
3. Consequently, the delay of 02 days in filing this restoration application (MCC) is hereby condoned. IA No.01 is allowed.
4. Also heard finally.
5. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of MAC-1489-2019, which was dismissed for want of prosecution by order dated 07.07.2026.
6. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. MAC-1489-2019 is restored to its original number for hearing and disposal in accordance with law.
7. Accordingly, the MCC allowed.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge s@if
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…