Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/4100/2021 of SWATI KUMARI Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 2 September 2026
2026:CGHC:39098 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4100 of 2021 Swati Kumari, W/o Chandan Kumar, Aged About 29 Years, Caste - Dusadh, R/o Vill- Paltu, Post Makhadumpur, District - Jahanabad, Bihar, Present R/o Q. No. 18A PP-Yad Colony, BMY Charoda Bhilai, District -
CGHC010264792021
2026:CGHC:39098
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 4100 of 2021
Swati Kumari, W/o Chandan Kumar, Aged About 29 Years, Caste - Dusadh, R/o Vill- Paltu, Post Makhadumpur, District - Jahanabad, Bihar, Present R/o Q. No. 18A PP-Yad Colony, BMY Charoda Bhilai, District - Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Its Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mahandi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 2 - The Regional Manager (Retail), Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Raipur Divisional Office, Indian Oil Bhavan, Rajiv Gandhi Marg (V.I.P.
Road), P.O. Ravigram, Telibandha, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 3 - The Collector, - Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, 4 - National Highways Authority Of India (Ministry Of Road Transport And Highways, Govt. Of India), Office Of Project Director, Project Implementation Unit, Bilaspur, D-61, HIG-1, Abhilasha Parisar, Behind Hitech Bus Stand - Tifra, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, 5 - Office of the Executive Engineer, Public Works Department National Highway, Division Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh,
... Respondents
For Petitioner
:
None.
For
State/respondents
No.1, 3 & 5
:
Shri Atanu Ghosh, Dy.G.A.
For respondent
No.2
:
Shri Anand Shukla, Advocate.
For respondent
No.4
:
Shri Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, Advocate.
SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 03/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Earlier the case was listed on 12/05/2026, 15/06/2026 and 18/08/2026, on all the three dates, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition.
2. In the above facts of the case, it appears that the petitioner has lost interest to prosecute this writ petition and therefore this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this writ petition for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge
gouri