Chhattisgarh High Court
CRMP/2282/2026 of ADITYA KUMAR LAKRA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 31 August 2026
2026:CGHC:38588-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2282 of 2026 1 - Aditya Kumar Lakra S/o Krishna Kumar Lakra, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village, Soor Kariyapara, P.S. Sitapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 2 - Vishesh Bhagat S/o Ravikant Bhagat, Aged About 19 Years, R/o
CGHC010333182026
2026:CGHC:38588-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRMP No. 2282 of 2026
1 - Aditya Kumar Lakra S/o Krishna Kumar Lakra, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Village, Soor Kariyapara, P.S. Sitapur, District Surguja
(C.G.).
2 - Vishesh Bhagat S/o Ravikant Bhagat, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Karabel, P.S. Sitapur, District Surguja (C.G.).
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Police Of P.S. Sitapur, District Surguja (C.G.).
2 - Santosh Tirky S/o Khurnu Tirky, Aged About 42 Years, R/o - Village Dharampur, Uperpara P.S. Sitapur, District Surguja (C.G.).
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Anil Tawadkar, Advocate.
For Respondent No.1 :
Mr. H.A.P.S. Bhatia, P.L.
For other Respondents :
Not noticed.
DB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
on Board
(01.09.2026)
1. The present CRMP has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of the FIR/Crime No. 57/2026 dated 17.02.2026, registered at Police Station Sitapur, District Surguja (C.G.), for the offences punishable under Sections 106(1), 125(a) and 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the charge is yet to be framed and that the petitioner would like to urge before the learned Trial Court that no offence is made out against him. He further submits that, in the event any adverse order is passed, the petitioner shall be at liberty to proceed in accordance with law. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to make the aforesaid submission before the learned Trial Court.
3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Judge $ourabh