Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/4866/2020 of S. KUMAR DAHARIYA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 31 August 2026
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4866 of 2020 S. Kumar Dahariya S/o Late Sakhuram Dahariya Aged About 43 Years R/o Krishak Nagar Village Jora, Tahsil And District Raipur (Cg), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The
CGHC010243702020
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 4866 of 2020
S. Kumar Dahariya S/o Late Sakhuram Dahariya Aged About 43 Years R/o Krishak Nagar Village Jora, Tahsil And District Raipur (Cg), District :
Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Works Capital Complex, New Raipur, Raipur (Cg), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chief Engineer Public Works Department, Near Kalimai Mandir Aakashwani Chowk, Raipur Dist. Raipur (Cg), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Executive Engineer Sub Division Survey, Public Works Department, Raipur, District Raipur (Cg), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents
[Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner :
Mr. Sudeep Johri, Advocate
For Respondents
:
Mr. Sharad Mishra, Panel Lawyer
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board)
01.09.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would make sole submission that for redressal of petitioner’s grievance, he may be permitted to file comprehensive representation before the respondent-authorities and same may be directed to be considered and decided within a reasonable time in light of circular dated 05.03.2008 (Annexure-P/05) SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN
and decision of the Supreme Court in Dharam Singh and ors v. State of UP and another 1 .
3. Be that as it may, the petitioner is permitted to file a comprehensive representation alongwith relevant documents and copy of this order within six weeks from today and, in turn, the concerned respondent-authority is directed to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner in light of circular dated 05.03.2008 (Annexure-P/05) and decision of the Supreme Court in the matter of Dharam Singh (supra) in accordance with law within a period of further 06 weeks from the date of receipt of said representation by passing reasoned and speaking order.
4. With aforesaid observation, direction and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.
sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge s@if
2025 AIR (SC) 3897