Chhattisgarh High Court
WPC/384/2021 of LAXMI PRASAD KURRE Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, on 31 August 2026
2026:CGHC:38865 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 384 of 2021 1 - Laxmi Prasad Kurre S/o Shri Manglu Kurre, Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Gataura, Tahsil - Masturi, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of
CGHC010015572021
2026:CGHC:38865
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 384 of 2021
1 - Laxmi Prasad Kurre S/o Shri Manglu Kurre, Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Gataura, Tahsil - Masturi, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner
Versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate
For Respondent-State :
Mr. Nitansh Kumar Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer
SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD
/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:-
“i)That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to call for the entire records of the case.
ii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider the acquisition of the petitioners land as per the 'Act of 2013' and thereafter to disburse the interest amount on the total compensation amount as per Section 80 of the 'Act of 2013' since 2013 to till date.
iii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider the acquisition of the petitioners land as per 'Act of 2013' and grant interest over the entire compensation amount at the rate of 15% since the use of land for the purposes of construction of road.
iv) That, any appropriate writ, direction or order may also kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners, which this Hon'ble court deems fit in the circumstances of the case.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition as the petitioner has already given consent for acquisition of his land under the Policy, 2016 formulated by the State Government.
3. On due consideration of the submission of counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY