Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/10783/2019 of DINESH PRASAD TIWARI Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 30 August 2026
2026:CGHC:38381 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10783 of 2019 Dinesh Prasad Tiwari, S/o. Shri Bisauha Tiwari, Aged About 45 Years, R/o. Village Chilfi, Tahsil And Police Station Saja, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh,
CGHC010437732019
2026:CGHC:38381
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 10783 of 2019
Dinesh Prasad Tiwari, S/o. Shri Bisauha Tiwari, Aged About 45 Years, R/o. Village Chilfi, Tahsil And Police Station Saja, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2 - The Commissioner, Durg Division, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
3 - The Collector, Bemetara, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh.
4 - The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Berla, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh.
5 - The Janpad Panchayat, Berla, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents
For Petitioner
:
None
For State/Respondents
:
Mr. H.A.P.S.Bhatia, Panel Lawyer
(Single Bench)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order on Board
31.08.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Earlier on 18.02.2026 and on 27.02.2026, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner and even today also, when the matter is called for hearing twice, none appeared nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner; therefore, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution.
2. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge Ashok