Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/615/2020 of CHANDRAPRABHA DEWANGAN Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 30 August 2026
(WPS No.615/2020) CGHC010031452020 2026:CGHC:38459 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 615 of 2020 Chandraprabha Dewangan, W/o Chandrashekhar Dewangan, aged about 31 years, Presently working as Lecturer (Panchayat) at Government Higher Secondary School, Pantora, Block Baloda,
(WPS No.615/2020)
CGHC010031452020
2026:CGHC:38459
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 615 of 2020
Chandraprabha Dewangan, W/o Chandrashekhar Dewangan, aged about 31 years, Presently working as Lecturer (Panchayat) at Government Higher Secondary School, Pantora, Block Baloda, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner
versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Secretary, Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3. Commissioner-cum-Director, Directorate of Panchayat, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
4. Director, Public Instructions, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate. For Respondents : Dr. Surendra Kumar Dewangan, Panel Lawyer. Single Bench:- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 31/08/2026
1. At the very outset, Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, seeks to withdraw this writ petition with liberty
(WPS No.615/2020) to make a representation before the respondent/competent authority with respect to absorption in light of the notification dated 30-6-2018 (Annexure P-4).
2. The prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner seems to be fair and reasonable.
3. Accordingly, the aforesaid liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner and this writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Soma