Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/1861/2020 of RAMJI SAHU Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 30 August 2026
2026:CGHC:38382 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1861 of 2020 Ramji Sahu, S/o. Lakhan Sahu, Aged About 45 Years, R/o. Village Marutola, Tahsil Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Water
CGHC010096742020
2026:CGHC:38382
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 1861 of 2020
Ramji Sahu, S/o. Lakhan Sahu, Aged About 45 Years, R/o. Village Marutola, Tahsil Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Water Resources Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2 - Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Pramod Ramteke, Advocate
For Respondents
:
Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, Govt. Advocate
(Single Bench)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order on Board
31.08.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner has preferred this petition seeking direction to the respondents to regularize his service.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be allowed to make a representation for regularization before the respondent authorities and the respondent authorities be directed to decide the representation of the petitioner to which learned State counsel has no objection.
3. Be that as it may, the petitioner is allowed to make a representation for regularization before the concerned respondents authority within a period of four weeks’ from today and, in turn, the concerned respondents are directed to consider and decide the petitioner’s representation in light of the circular dated 05.03.2008 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of said representation.
4. With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Ashok
Judge