Chhattisgarh High Court

CRMP/612/2022 of HIMANSHU SAHU Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 30 August 2026

2026:CGHC:38455

2026:CGHC:38455-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 612 of 2022 Himanshu Sahu S/o Jamuna Prasad Sahu Aged About 22 Years R/o House No. 210 Street 29, Avinash Capital Homes Phase II Saddu, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492001 ... Petitioner versus State of Chhattisgarh Through

CGHC010119262022

2026:CGHC:38455-DB

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

CRMP No. 612 of 2022

Himanshu Sahu S/o Jamuna Prasad Sahu Aged About 22 Years R/o House No. 210 Street 29, Avinash Capital Homes Phase II Saddu, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492001

... Petitioner

versus

State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Vidhansabha, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

... Respondent

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate For Respondent /State : Mr. Saumya Rai, Dy. Govt. Advocate

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice

Hon'ble

Mr.

Radhakishan Agrawal

, Judge

Order

on Board

Per

Ramesh Sinha

, Chief Justice

31.08.2026

1. Heard Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Saumya Rai, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondent.

2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of CrPC with the following prayer :- ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA

Page 1 of 2

“It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside/quash the impugned FIR No. 93/2022 filed in Thana Vidhasabha, Raipur on 25/02/2022 under section 67 and 67-A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, in the interest of justice.”

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant petition has become infructuous as the trial has already been concluded and the petitioner has been acquitted vide order dated 24.11.2025.

4. Learned State counsel endorses the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

5. In view of the above, instant petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead