Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/293/2020 of DR. AJAY DANI Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 24 August 2026
of 2020) CGHC010008022020 2026:CGHC:38073 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 293 of 2020 1 - Dr. Ajay Dani S/o Late Upendra Prasad Dani Aged About 63 Years Resident Of Sanskar 286, Aarya Nagar, Near Urvashi Beauty Parlour Durg, District- Durg Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus
(WPS No. 293 of 2020)
CGHC010008022020
2026:CGHC:38073
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 293 of 2020
1 - Dr. Ajay Dani S/o Late Upendra Prasad Dani Aged About 63
Years Resident Of Sanskar 286, Aarya Nagar, Near Urvashi Beauty Parlour Durg, District- Durg Chhattisgarh
--- Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Health And Family Walefare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Atal Nagar New Raipur Chhattisgarh, District :
Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2 - The Director Directorate Of Health Services, Indrawati Bhawan Mantralaya Atal Nagar New Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s)
(Cause-title taken from the Case Information System)
For Petitioner :- Mr. Jitendra Gupta, Advocate For State :- Mr. Sharad Mishra, Panel Lawyer SB - Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 25.08.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner feeling aggrieved by order dated 10.10.2018 & 15.01.2019 (Annexure P/1), whereby, the expenditures of his Srilanka
(WPS No. 293 of 2020) Exposure Visit to the tune of Rs.1,08,998/- have been deducted from his arrears bill.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent authorities may be directed to refund the deducted amount of Rs.1,08,998/- to the petitioner with an interest @ 12% from the date of deduction.
3. Learned State Counsel would submit that the petitioner’s representation is pending consideration vide Annexure P/4 and the same would be considered and decided.
4. Be that as it may, the concerned respondent authority is directed to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner on its own merit strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order within six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
5. With the aforesaid direction and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands finally disposed of.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge @d!t!