Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/9015/2019 of SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 24 August 2026
of 2019) CGHC010341762019 2026:CGHC:38068 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9015 of 2019 1 - Santosh Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Hublal Yadav Aged About 37 Years Occupation - Sahayak Shikshak Lb Govt. Prathamik Shala Sukhapali, Niwasi Gram Sukhapali, Vikas Khand Khadgava, Thana
CGHC010341762019
2026:CGHC:38068
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 9015 of 2019
1 - Santosh Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Hublal Yadav Aged About 37
Years Occupation - Sahayak Shikshak Lb Govt. Prathamik Shala Sukhapali, Niwasi Gram Sukhapali, Vikas Khand Khadgava, Thana Khadgava, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh
--- Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Sachiv, School Shiksha Vibhag, Mantralay Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ayukt Adim Jati Tatha Anusuchit Jati Vikas Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sanchalak Lokshikshan Sanchanalay Khand 03 Indirawati Bhawan Raipur Jila Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Jila Shiksha Adhikari Korea, District Korea Chhattisgarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh
Jila Shiksha Adhikari Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Vikas Khand Shiksha Adhikari Vikas Khand Khadgava, District Korea Chhattisgarh., District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s)
(Cause-title taken from the Case Information System)
For Petitioner
:- Mr. Abdul Moin Khan, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate For Respondent-State :- Mr. Pranjal Shukla, Panel Lawyer SB - Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 25.08.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition claiming that he is entitled for two advance increments in lieu of acquiring D.Ed. Certificate at his own expenses after joining the service on the post of Assistant Teacher and after due permission from the State Government.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled for grant of two advance increments as he has passed D.Ed. Examination after due permission from the State Government.
3. On the other hand, learned State Counsel would submit that the State Government has issued circular dated 07.03.2020, wherein it has been clearly stated that the persons who were appointed after 16.06.1993 would not be entitled for the benefit of two advance increments in lieu of acquiring B.Ed./D.Ed. Certificate on their own expenses, as the qualification of B.Ed./D.Ed. became necessary qualifications to get appointment on the said posts.
4. As such, in view of circular dated 07.03.2020, the petitioner is not entitled for grant of two advance increments. Furthermore, circular dated 07.03.2020 has not been challenged by way of this writ petition. Accordingly, I do not find any merit in this writ petition. It deserves to be and is accordingly, dismissed. No cost(s).
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge @d!t!