Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/2307/2020 of JAMUNA TIWARI Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 24 August 2026
of 2020) CGHC010096662020 2026:CGHC:38071 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2307 of 2020 1 - Jamuna Tiwari W/o Shri Deepak Tiwari Aged About 39 Years (Constable) R/o Police Station Sakti District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh
(WPS No. 2307 of 2020)
CGHC010096662020
2026:CGHC:38071
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 2307 of 2020
1 - Jamuna Tiwari W/o Shri Deepak Tiwari Aged About 39 Years (Constable) R/o Police Station Sakti District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
--- Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director General Of Police Police Head Quarter, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Inspector General Of Police Bilaspur Range, I.G. Office, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Superintendent Of Police Janjgirchampa, District :
Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s)
(Cause-title taken from the Case Information System)
For Petitioner :- Mr. B.S. Rajput, Advocate For State :- Mr. Amit Buxy, Dy. Govt. Advocate SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 25.08.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard.
(WPS No. 2307 of 2020)
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, although the petitioner has been granted promotion, she may be permitted to make a representation before the respondent authority seeking grant of promotion with effect from 30.08.2018.
3. Be that as it may, the petitioner is allowed to file a representation along with copy of this order and other relevant documents before the concerned respondent authority for redressal of her grievance within three weeks from today, and, in turn, the respondent authority is directed to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner on its own merit strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order within six weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation.
4. With the aforesaid direction and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands finally disposed of.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge @d!t!