Chhattisgarh High Court

WPS/2903/2020 of ANJU DEHARI Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 24 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2020 CGHC010149932020 2026:CGHC:38127 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2903 of 2020  Anju Dehari W/o Late Shri T.R. Dehari, Aged About 44 Years, Sahayak Grade II (Initially Appointed On Compassionate Ground As Assistant Grade III), PWD Durg Mandal, Durg, Chhattisgarh.

CGHC010149932020

2026:CGHC:38127

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WPS No. 2903 of 2020

Anju Dehari W/o Late Shri T.R. Dehari, Aged About 44 Years, Sahayak Grade II (Initially Appointed On Compassionate Ground As Assistant Grade III), PWD Durg Mandal, Durg, Chhattisgarh.

... Petitioner

versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department Ministry, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Engineer In Chief Public Works Department, Sirpur Bhavan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Superintending Engineer P.W.D., Durg Division, Durg C.G.

... Respondents For Petitioner :- Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate, appears on behalf of Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate. For State :- Mr. Pranjal Shukla, Panel Lawyer. SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 25.08.2026

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner has already made representation for redressal of his grievance ANKIT KUMAR SINGH Digitally signed by ANKIT KUMAR SINGH

before the competent authority, but the same has not been decided yet, therefore, he would pray for direction to decide the same within the stipulated time.

3. Be that as it may, the competent authority is directed to decide the petitioner’s representation within 45 days’ from the date of receipt of copy of this order by passing speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law. However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

4. With the aforesaid observation / direction the instant writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal)

Judge Ankit

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead