Chhattisgarh High Court
MAC/467/2019 of SAMODH PAIKRA Vs SONKUNWAR PAIKRA on 24 August 2026
of 2019) CGHC010052852019 2026:CGHC:38088 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 467 of 2019 1 - Samodh Paikra S/o Late Rampati Paikra Aged About 20 Years R/o Village Chendra, Police Station Jhilmili , Tahsil- Odgi, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh..................Owner ---
(MAC No. 467 of 2019)
CGHC010052852019
2026:CGHC:38088
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MAC No. 467 of 2019
1 - Samodh Paikra S/o Late Rampati Paikra Aged About 20
Years R/o Village Chendra, Police Station Jhilmili , Tahsil- Odgi, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh..................Owner
--- Appellant(s)
versus
1 - Sonkunwar Paikra Wd/o Late Rampati Paikra Aged About 50
Years R/o Village Chendra, Police Station Jhilmili, Tahsil Odgi, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 2 - Sheela Paikar D/o Late Rampati Paikra Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Chendra, Police Station Jhilmili, Tahsil Odgi, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Divisional Office, Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s)
(Cause-title taken from the Case Information System)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Appellant :- Mr. Shrikant Kaushik, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Rishikant Mahobia, Advocate For Respondent No.3
:- Mr. Sudhir Agrawal and Mr. Shashank
Agrawal, Advocates
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB - Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Judgment On Board
25.08.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant appeal
(MAC No. 467 of 2019) with liberty to file an appropriate application under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure before the Claims Tribunal for setting aside the impugned award, which prayer is not opposed by the other side.
2. With the aforesaid liberty, the appeal stands disposed of. This Court has expressed no opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge @d!t!