Chhattisgarh High Court
MCC/784/2026 of SMT. PRAGYA PANIKAR (PRAGYA SINGH) Vs VINAY KUMAR PANIKAR on 24 August 2026
2026:CGHC:38039-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 784 of 2026 1 - Smt. Pragya Panikar (Pragya Singh) W/o Shri Vinay Kumar Panikar, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Alka Avenue, Quarter No. 89, Uslapur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh At Present R/o C/o Brijmohan
CGHC010319182026
2026:CGHC:38039-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCC No. 784 of 2026
1 - Smt. Pragya Panikar (Pragya Singh) W/o Shri Vinay Kumar Panikar, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Alka Avenue, Quarter No. 89, Uslapur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh At Present R/o C/o Brijmohan Singh Raja Para, Mahaveer Gali, Tehsil Sarangarh, District Sarangarh Bilaigarh Chhattisgarh.
... Appellant
versus
1 - Vinay Kumar Panikar S/o Shri S.K. Panikar Aged About 41 Years R/o Near Eidgah Chowk, Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
For Applicant
:
Mr. Priyanshu Gupta, Advocate.
For Respondent
:
Mr. Prasoon Agrawal, Advocate
DB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal and Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
on Board
(25.08.2026) Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
1. Heard on I.A. No. 01/2026 for condonation of delay in filing the instant application.
2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay in filing the instant application is condoned.
3. Also heard on admission.
4. Admit.
5. The present MCC has been filed seeking for restoration of FA(MAT) No. 263/2024 which got dismissed on account of peremptory order passed by this Court on 15.01.2026.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the reasons stated in the application, the MCC is allowed, and FA(MAT) No. 263/2024 is directed to be restored to its original number, subject to the applicant depositing costs of Rs. 2,000/- with the High Court Legal Services Committee within a period of one week from today, failing which, the order shall stand dissolved automatically without further reference to the Bench
7. Accordingly, the MCC is disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Judge $ourabh