Chhattisgarh High Court
MCC/795/2026 of AATMARAM NETAM Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 24 August 2026
of 2026) CGHC010322882026 2026:CGHC:38075 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 795 of 2026 1 - Aatmaram Netam S/o Shri Veer Singh Netam Aged About 54 Years Working As Senior Cooperative Inspector, Office Of Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Kanker, District - North Bastar
(MCC No. 795 of 2026)
CGHC010322882026
2026:CGHC:38075
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCC No. 795 of 2026
1 - Aatmaram Netam S/o Shri Veer Singh Netam Aged About 54
Years Working As Senior Cooperative Inspector, Office Of Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Kanker, District - North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh.
--- Applicant(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Cooperative Department, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Registrar Cooperative Societies Chhattisgarh, Raipur Chhattisgarh, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Additional Registrar Cooperative Societies Chhattisgarh, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Assistant Registrar Cooperative Societies Chhattisgarh, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Deputy Registrar Cooperative Societies Kanker, District - North Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh 6 - Bethel Ekka Working As Senior Cooperative Inspector, Office Of Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s)
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant :- Mr. Shreyansh Pathak, Advocate For Respondent-State :- Mr. Amit Buxy, Dy. GA
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MCC No. 795 of 2026)
SB - Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board
25.08.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard on admission.
2. Admit.
3. With the consent of the parties, heard finally.
4. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of WPS No.1163/2019, which was dismissed for want of prosecution by order of this Court dated 29.07.2026.
5. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. WPS No.1163/2019 is restored to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand Only) before the High Court Legal Services Committee and file proof thereof before this Court within 15 days from today. It is made clear that failure to deposit amount of cost by the applicant within above time frame, will lead to automatic dissolution of this order.
6. Accordingly, this MCC is allowed. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge @d!t!