Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/10896/2019 of SMT. RAMBATI USENDI Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 24 August 2026
2026:CGHC:38084 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10896 of 2019 1 - Smt. Rambati Usendi W/o Shri Manohar Usendi Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Koliyar, Post Suleri, Tahsil And District Kanker, Chhattisgarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 -
CGHC010445902019
2026:CGHC:38084
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 10896 of 2019
1 - Smt. Rambati Usendi W/o Shri Manohar Usendi Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Koliyar, Post Suleri, Tahsil And District Kanker, Chhattisgarh., District :
Kanker, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Social Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., 2 - The Collector Kanker, District Kanker, Chhattisgarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Deputy Director Panchayat And Social Welfare, Kanker, District Kanker, Chhattisgarh., 4 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Kanker, District Kanker, Chhattisgarh., 5 - The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Kanker, District Kanker, Chhattisgarh., 6 - Gram Panchayat Domaharra Through The Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Domaharra, Tahsil And District Kanker, Chhattisgarh.
7 - Arun Kumar Nayak S/o Rajaram Nayak, R/o Village And Post Parod, Tahsil And District Kanker, Chhattisgarh.
8 - Hemant Mandavi S/o Dashruram Mandavi, R/o Village Kodejunga, Post Makdi, Tahsil And District Kanker, Chhattisgarh.
9 - Dechand Mandavi S/o Narsingh Mandavi, R/o Village Dhantulshi, Post Peedhapal, Tahsil And District Kanker, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Rajkumar Pali, Advocate
For Respondent/State
For Respondent No. 5
:
:
Mr. Pranjal Shukla, P.L.
Mr. Aniket Verma, on behalf of Mr. Jitendra Pali, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, Judge
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
on Board
25.08.2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking for following relief(s):- 10.1) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire record pertaining to the case of petitioner from the respondent authorities for kind perusal. or 10.2) That, this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ mandamus directing the respondent authorities to count seniority from 1st date of appointment order and pay proper salary as per new pay structure and other service benefit to the petitioner.
10.3) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other ancillary, as it may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already submitted a representation (Annexure P/7) before respondent No. 5. However, he submits that the petitioner would file a fresh representation before respondent No. 5 with regard to the relief claimed in the writ petition and confines his prayer to a direction to the competent authority to consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within a stipulated period.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not oppose the limited prayer made on behalf of the petitioners.
4. Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner is permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent No. 5/The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Kanker within a period of two weeks from today. Upon receipt of such representation, respondent No. 5 shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned and speaking order, within a period of six weeks thereafter.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case.
6. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge Jyoti