Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/10866/2019 of RAGHUVEER JAISWAL Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 24 August 2026
2026:CGHC:38085 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10866 of 2019 1 - Raghuveer Jaiswal S/o Shri Ram Prasad Jaiswal Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Tendubhatha, Tahsil Janjgir, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa,
CGHC010442132019
2026:CGHC:38085
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 10866 of 2019
1 - Raghuveer Jaiswal S/o Shri Ram Prasad Jaiswal Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Tendubhatha, Tahsil Janjgir, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Energy/
Electricity, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh., 2 - The Executive Director (Human Resource), Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited Raipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., 3 - The Chief Executive Officer Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited, Danganiya, Raipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., 4 - The Chief Engineer 2x500 Megawatt, Atal Bihari Bajpai, Tap Vidyute Pariyojana, Madwa-Tendubhatha, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh., 5 - The Superintendent Engineer (Civil) Circle-3, 2x500 Megawatt, Atal Bihari Bajpai, Tap Vidyute Pariyojana, Madwa-Tendubhatha, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Vishvanath Shrivas, Advocate
For Respondent/State
For Respondents No. 2
to 5
:
:
Mr. Pranjal Shukla, P.L.
Mr. Ghanshyam Patel, Advocate
Hon’ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, Judge
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
on Board
25.08.2026
1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instructions from the petitioner.
2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present writ petition for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge Jyoti