Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/10310/2019 of VIMAL KUMAR VERMA Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 23 August 2026
of 2019) CGHC010416542019 2026:CGHC:37768 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10310 of 2019 1 - Vimal Kumar Verma S/o Late Shri Gopeshwar Prasad Verma Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Satbhanva, Post Bhainsa, Tahsil Tilda, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1
CGHC010416542019
2026:CGHC:37768
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 10310 of 2019
1 - Vimal Kumar Verma S/o Late Shri Gopeshwar Prasad Verma Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Satbhanva, Post Bhainsa, Tahsil Tilda, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
--- Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Police Station Rakhi, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - District Education Officer Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Block Education Officer Block Tilda Nevra, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Principal Government High School Sarora, Block Tilda, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Smt. Rajeshwari Verma W/o Sanat Verma R/o Shyam Nagar, Tilda, Post And Police Station Tilda, Chhattisgarh.
6 - Bharti Verma W/o Shri Pawan Verma D/o Late Gopeshwar Prasad Verma, R/o Kailashpuri, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 7 - Mamta Verma W/o Shri Govind Verma D/o Late Gopeshwar Prasad Verma, R/o Bhathapara, Village Suhela, District :
Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s)
(Cause-title taken from the Case Information System)
For Petitioner
:- Mr. Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate
For Respondent-State :- Mr. Sharad Mishra, Panel Lawyer SB - Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 24.08.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard.
2. The present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to issue an appointment order in his favour on compassionate grounds, instead of in favour of respondent No. 5.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s father died in harness on 19.06.2019 and the petitioner preferred an application vide Annexure P/3 before the respondent authority for grant of compassionate appointment but the same is pending consideration till date.
4. Be that as it may, the concerned respondent authority is directed to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner on its own merit strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Respondent No. 5 shall also be at liberty to make a representation before the respondent authority prior to the passing of the order.
5. With the aforesaid direction and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands finally disposed of.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge @d!t!