Chhattisgarh High Court

WPS/6646/2019 of ABHISHEK DWIVEDI Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 23 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026:CGHC:37952 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6646 of 2019 Abhishek Dwivedi, S/o. Shri Dinesh Kumar Dwivedi, Aged About 38 Years, R/o. Village Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary,

CGHC010282362019

2026:CGHC:37952

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WPS No. 6646 of 2019

Abhishek Dwivedi, S/o. Shri Dinesh Kumar Dwivedi, Aged About 38

Years, R/o. Village Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh.

... Petitioner

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahandi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2 - Directorate Of Public Instructions, Through Director Chhattisgarh, Indravati Bhavan, Block III, First Floor, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3.

District Education Officer, Korba, Department Of School Education, District – Korba, Chhattisgarh.

... Respondents

For Petitioner

:

Mr. Waquar Naiyer, Advocate

For Respondents

:

Mr. Sharad Mishra, Panel Lawyer

(Single Bench)

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Order on Board

24.08.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that against the order of absorption, the petitioner has made a representation vide Annexure P-6, which has not been considered and decided by the respondent authorities.

2. Be that as it may, the concerned respondent authority is directed to consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioner i.e. Annexures P-6, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the matter.

3. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Ashok Judge

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead