Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/471/2020 of KU. BABITA PRADHAN Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 23 August 2026
2026:CGHC:37942 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 471 of 2020 Ku. Babita Pradhan D/o Shri Sukhdev Pradhan Aged About 31 Years Presently Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Pardhiya, Block Pithoura, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.,
CGHC010017472020
2026:CGHC:37942
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 471 of 2020
Ku. Babita Pradhan D/o Shri Sukhdev Pradhan Aged About 31 Years Presently Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Pardhiya, Block Pithoura, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Secretary Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Director Public Instructions, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents
Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :
Mr. C Jayant K. Rao, Advocate
For Respondent
:
Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, GA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 24/08/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to make a representation before the respondent/competent authority with respect to absorption as he submits that petitioner has been absorbed in the year 2019 and 2020 whereas he is entitled for absorption w.e.f 01/07/2018.
2. The prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner seems fair and reasonable.
3. Accordingly, the aforesaid liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner and this writ petition stands disposed of. No cost(s). sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if