Chhattisgarh High Court
WPS/924/2020 of FRANCIS XALXO Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 19 August 2026
of 2020) CGHC010050982020 2026:CGHC:37321 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 924 of 2020 1 - Francis Xalxo S/o Late Peelu Xalxo Aged About 78 Years Resident Of Ward No. 13, Lormi, Tahsil-Lormi, District- Mungeli, Chhattigarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh
(WPS No. 924 of 2020)
CGHC010050982020
2026:CGHC:37321
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 924 of 2020
1 - Francis Xalxo S/o Late Peelu Xalxo Aged About 78 Years Resident Of Ward No. 13, Lormi, Tahsil-Lormi, District- Mungeli, Chhattigarh
--- Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, C.G., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Tahsildar, Kota District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s)
(Cause-title taken from the Case Information System)
For Petitioner :- Mr. Ajeet Kumar Yadav, Advocate For State :- Mr. H.A.P.S. Bhatia, Panel Lawyer SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 20.08
.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This writ petition is not directed against any particular order but against inaction on the part of the respondent
(WPS No. 924 of 2020) authorities for not releasing the family pension in favour of the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made several representations before the respondent authorities for grant of family pension but no action has been taken till date.
3. In that view of the matter, if the representation of the petitioner has not been considered and decided till date, the Collector, Bilaspur/concerned respondent authority is directed to consider and decide the petitioner’s representation for grant of family pension by passing a reasoned and speaking order within 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order under intimation to the petitioner.
4. With the aforesaid direction and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands finally disposed of.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge @d!t!