Chhattisgarh High Court

ACQA/180/2018 of MADHYA PRADESH NAGRIK AAPURTI NIGAM LIMITED, BHOPAL (M.P.) Vs AMARCHAND JAIN on 16 August 2026

2026:CGHC:36527

2026:CGHC:36527-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 180 of 2018 1 - Madhya Pradesh Nagrik Aapurti Nigam Limited, Bhopal (M.P.) Now Chhattisgarh State Nagrik Aapurti Nigam, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Through Its District Manager, R.B. Shukla., District : Raipur,

CGHC010161982018

2026:CGHC:36527-DB

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

ACQA No. 180 of 2018

1 - Madhya Pradesh Nagrik Aapurti Nigam Limited, Bhopal (M.P.) Now Chhattisgarh State Nagrik Aapurti Nigam, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Through Its District Manager, R.B. Shukla., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

... Appellant

versus

1 - Amarchand Jain President Nagrik Sahakari Bank, Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh., District :

Dhamtari,

Chhattisgarh

2 - Manager, Nagrik Sahakari Bank Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh, Samvinder Singh Khalsa, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 3 - Dilawar Rokadiya Vice President, District Nagrik Sahakri Bank, Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Sarla Jain Vice President, Nagrik Sahakari Bank, Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.

... Respondents

For Appellant

: None.

For Respondents No.1 & 2

For Respondent No.3

For Respondent No.4

:

:

:

None, though served.

Shri Adil Minhaj, Advocate.

Shri Shashwat Gupta, counsel appears on behalf of Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Advocate.

Page 1 of 2

D

B:Hon'ble Shri Sanjay S. Agrawal, J

Hon’ble Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal, J

Order On Board

17.08.2026

1. Earlier the case was listed on 17.12.2025, however, none had appeared nor any representation is made on behalf of the Appellant, therefore, the case was adjourned. Even today, when the case is called twice, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the Appellant.

2. In view of above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sd/-

(Sanjay S. Agrawal) (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Judge Nikita

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead