Chhattisgarh High Court

MCC/737/2026 of BEDURAM Vs VIJAY LAXMI on 13 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026:CGHC:36268 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No.737 of 2026 Beduram S/o Kolhau Aged About 78 Years Caste Kurmi, R/o Village Dagori, Tahsil Bilha, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Applicant versus 1 - Vijay Laxmi D/o Late Shri Jagdish Prasad Aged About now 57 Years Caste

CGHC010295482026

2026:CGHC:36268

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

MCC No.737 of 2026

Beduram S/o Kolhau Aged About 78 Years Caste Kurmi, R/o Village Dagori, Tahsil Bilha, District- Bilaspur (C.G.)

... Applicant

versus

1 - Vijay Laxmi D/o Late Shri Jagdish Prasad Aged About now 57 Years Caste Bramhin R/o Village Dagori, Tahsil Bilha, District- Bilaspur (C.G.)

2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The District Collector, District- Bilaspur

(C.G.)

... Respondents

For Applicant

:

Shri Ravikar Patel, Advocate

For Respondent No.1 :

None, though copy of the petition has

already been supplied to counsel for

Respondent No.1.

For Respondent No.2 :

Shri Kanhaiya Ram Yadav, Panel Lawyer

Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal Order On Board 14/08/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard on admission.

2. This application (MCC) has been filed for restoration of MCC No.395 of 2023, which was dismissed in default vide order dated 20/07/2026.

3. On due consideration and for the reasons assigned therein, which is duly supported by an affidavit, I am inclined to allow the same. Accordingly, the application (MCC) is allowed and the order of dismissal passed by this

Court on 20/07/2026 in MCC No.395 of 2023 is hereby recalled and the MCC No.395 of 2023 is restored to its original number.

4. Consequently, the MCC No.737 of 2026 stands disposed of. No order as to costs. SD/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal)

J U D G E Tumane

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead