Chhattisgarh High Court

MCC/462/2026 of SMT. VANDANA TIWARI Vs RAMSWARUP @ LILU AGARWAL on 11 August 2026

2026:CGHC:35519

2026:CGHC:35519 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 462 of 2026 1 - Smt. Vandana Tiwari Wd/o Late Anuj Tiwari Aged About 35 Years R/o Village- Kotkharra, P.S.- Gourela, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Smt. Sona Bai Wd/o Late Chunnilal Tiwari Aged About 65 Years R/o Village-

CGHC010157382026

2026:CGHC:35519

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

MCC No. 462 of 2026

1 - Smt. Vandana Tiwari Wd/o Late Anuj Tiwari Aged About 35 Years R/o Village- Kotkharra, P.S.- Gourela, District- Bilaspur (C.G.)

2 - Smt. Sona Bai Wd/o Late Chunnilal Tiwari Aged About 65 Years R/o Village- Kotkharra, P.S.- Gourela, District- Bilaspur (C.G.)

3 - Ku. Sambhavi Tiwari D/o Late Anuj Tiwari Aged About 4 Years Minors Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Vandana Tiwari, Wd/o Late Anuj Tiwari, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village- Kotkharra, P.S.- Gourela, District- Bilaspur

(C.G.)

4 - Ku. Soumya Tiwari D/o Late Anuj Tiwari Aged About 15 Years Minors Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Vandana Tiwari, Wd/o Late Anuj Tiwari, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village- Kotkharra, P.S.- Gourela, District- Bilaspur

(C.G.)

... Applicants

versus

1 - Ramswarup @ Lilu Agarwal S/o Girdhari Lal Agarwal Aged About 53 Years R/o Marwahi Road- Pendra, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) (Owner)

2 - The Oriental Insurance Company Bilaspur, T.P. Nagar, Korba, District Korba

(C.G.) (Insurer)

---- Respondents

For Applicants

: Mr. Yogendra Chaturvedi, Advocate

For Respondent No.2

: Ms. Swati Agrawal, Advocate on behalf

of Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate

Page 1 of 2

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order on Board 12/08/2026

1. Heard on I.A. No.01/2026, application for condonation of delay in filing the instant MCC.

2. On due consideration and for the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 255 days in filing the MCC is hereby condoned.

3. This MCC has been filed for restoration of MAC No.1550 of 2016, which was dismissed for want of prosecution by this Court vide order dated 03.07.2025.

4. On due consideration and for the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, I am satisfied that sufficient cause has been shown for restoration of MAC No.1550 of 2016.

5. Accordingly, this MCC is allowed. Registry is directed to restore MAC No.1550 of 2016 to its original number.

6. Resultantly, the instant MCC stands disposed of.

Sd/-

(Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Vasant

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead