Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal
RELIANCE TELECOM LTD vs UNION OF INDIA on 2 July 2014
NEW DELHI
Dated 2nd July, 2014
Vs.
Union of India
…Respondent
Vs.
Union of India, New Delhi …Respondent
…Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India, New Delhi …Respondent
…Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India
…Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India
…Respondent
BEFORE:
:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
4
Decisions referred to
In this index
3
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Judgment
2.
3.
(i) any time;
(ii)
(iii) clause :-
4.
5. final.
6. No. Period No. of Missing CAFs No. of cases non compliant Total rejected Penalty
RCL vs. UOI
Total
RCL vs. UOI
September,
October,
November,
Total
3. RTL vs. UOI August,
September,
October,
November,
Total
7. petition1[unless otherwise mentioned, the facts are taken from petition no. 48 of
.
8.
9.
10. months.
11. 3 (2010) 13 SCC 427
as below :-
date.”
12.
13.
14. “The Service Providers shall be requested to submit the
To
ADG-IV
“Dear Sir,
“To
Bhopal M.P.
regard.
ADG (TERM)
TERM Cell, MP”
15.
and Another Vs. Aravacode Chakungal Jayapalan6 . Hon’ble Supreme Court has observed in para 13 as under :-
6 (2004) 8 SCC 689
16. “8.
functions.”
17. ..………………. (Aftab Alam) Chairperson
....………………. (Kuldip Singh) Member
rkc
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
Dated July, 2014
Vs. Union of India
…Respondent
Vs. Union of India, New Delhi …Respondent
…Petitioner Vs. Union of India, New Delhi …Respondent
…Petitioner Vs. Union of India
…Petitioner Vs. Union of India
…Respondent
BEFORE:
:
Judgment
2.
3.
(i) any time;
(ii)
(iii) clause :-
4.
5. final.
6. No. Period No. of Missing CAFs No. of cases non compliant Total rejected Penalty
RCL vs. UOI
Total
RCL vs. UOI
September,
October,
November,
Total
3. RTL vs. UOI August,
September,
October,
November,
Total
7. petition8[unless otherwise mentioned, the facts are taken from petition no. 48 of
.
8.
9.
10.
months.
11. 10 (2010) 13 SCC 427
as below :-
date.”
12.
13.
14. “The Service Providers shall be requested to submit the
To
ADG-IV
“Dear Sir,
“To
Bhopal M.P.
regard.
ADG (TERM)
TERM Cell, MP”
15. and Another Vs. Aravacode Chakungal Jayapalan13 . Hon’ble Supreme Court has observed in para 13 as under :-
13 (2004) 8 SCC 689
16. “8.
functions.”
17. ..………………. (Aftab Alam) Chairperson
....………………. (Kuldip Singh) Member
rkc
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
Dated July, 2014
Vs. Union of India
…Respondent
Vs. Union of India, New Delhi …Respondent
…Petitioner Vs. Union of India, New Delhi …Respondent
…Petitioner Vs. Union of India
…Petitioner Vs. Union of India
…Respondent
BEFORE:
:
Judgment
2.
3.
(i) any time;
(ii)
(iii) clause :-
4.
5. final.
6. No. Period No. of Missing CAFs No. of cases non compliant Total rejected Penalty
RCL vs. UOI
Total
RCL vs. UOI
September,
October,
November,
Total
3. RTL vs. UOI August,
September,
October,
November,
Total
7. petition15[unless otherwise mentioned, the facts are taken from petition no. 48 of 2012] .
8.
9.
10. months.
11. 17 (2010) 13 SCC 427
as below :-
date.”
12.
13.
14. “The Service Providers shall be requested to submit the
To
ADG-IV
“Dear Sir,
“To
Bhopal M.P.
regard.
ADG (TERM)
TERM Cell, MP”
15.
and Another Vs. Aravacode Chakungal Jayapalan20 . Hon’ble Supreme Court has observed in para 13 as under :-
20 (2004) 8 SCC 689
16. “8.
functions.”
17. ..………………. (Aftab Alam) Chairperson
....………………. (Kuldip Singh) Member
rkc