ACQA/819/2019 of MEENA BAI Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND OTHERS on 4 August 2026

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Police Station Barela, Bemetara, District Bemetara (C.G.). .

2. Gyanchand Giakaward S/o Late Chandu Giawakard, Aged About 24 Years,

3. Balram Giakaward S/o Late Chandu Giawakard, Aged About 34 Years,

4. Jaiprakash Giawakard S/o Late Chandu Giawakard, Aged About 21 Years,

5. Ramkuwar Bai W/o Late Chandu Giawakard, Aged About 58 Years,

6. Anita Giakaward W/o Balram Giakaward, Aged About 30 Years,

7. Dikeshwar @ Diku S/o Late Chandu Giawakard, Aged About 26 Years,

8. Maheshwar @ Nema S/o Late Chandu Giawakard, Aged About 26 Years, Respondent No. 2 to 8 Are R/o Surholi, Post Office Kusmi, Police Station Berla, District Bemetara (C.G.).

9. Kamla Kosre W/o Aanandram Kosre, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Sakni Ahiwara, Police Station Nandani, District Durg (C.G.).

... Respondent(s) For Appellant : None. For Respondent No.1/State : Mr. Sachidanand Yadav, P.L. For Respondents No.2 to 9 : Mr. Amit Kumar Sahu, Advocate.

DB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal & Hon'ble Sh

ri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Order On Board 05/08/2026

The matter was passed over once in absence of any representation on behalf of the Appellant. Even in the second call none appeared, nor any representation is made on behalf of the Appellant.

Under these circumstances, this Court is left with no other option, except to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. -Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge -Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Chandrakant