Chhattisgarh High Court
MCC/1275/2025 of DOMENDRA KUMAR Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 28 July 2026
2026:CGHC:32668 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1275 of 2025 Domendra Kumar S/o Late Shri Omprakash Sahu, Aged About 21 Years R/o Village And Post Hasda No. 1, Panduka Tah. And Block- Magarlod Dhamtari Distt- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh, (Original Petitioner Omprakash Sahu
CGHC010520242025
2026:CGHC:32668
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCC No. 1275 of 2025
Domendra Kumar S/o Late Shri Omprakash Sahu, Aged About 21 Years R/o Village And Post Hasda No. 1, Panduka Tah. And Block- Magarlod Dhamtari Distt- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh, (Original Petitioner Omprakash Sahu Died On 10.11.2021
During Pendency Of The Writ Petition (S) No.2299/2016 Through Legal Representative His Son Present Petition As Mentioned In The Cause Title)
... Applicant
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Ministry, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, P.S. Rakhi, New Raipur Chhattisgarh, 2 - District Education Officer Raipur Chhattisgarh, 3 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Magar Load Distt- Dhamtari Chhattisgarh, 4 - Pracharya Navin High School Hasda, Tahsil Magarload District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.
... Non-applicants
For Applicant
:
Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate.
For Non-applicants
No.1,2 and 4
:
Shri Vinod Tekam, Govt. Advocate.
SB: Hon'ble Shri Justic
e Sanjay S. Agrawal
Order on Board
29/07/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard on I.A. No.1/2026, an application seeking permission to pursue the instant petition on behalf of Domendra Kumar, who is the son of deceased Omprakash, the original petitioner.
2. On due consideration, the application is allowed and he is permitted to pursue this petition.
3. Also heard on admission.
4. This petition has been filed for restoration of WPS No.2299/2016, which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 25/11/2024.
5. On due consideration and for the reason assigned in the petition, which is duly supported by an affidavit, I am inclined to allow the same. The petition is, accordingly, allowed and WPS No.2299/2016 is directed to be restored to its original number. No order as to cost.
Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal)
JUDGE Kamde