Chhattisgarh High Court
MCC/1105/2019 of (DELETED) SMT. MAHENDRA KAUR (DIED) Vs SMT. CHANDRA PRABHA GUPTA on 28 July 2026
2026:CGHC:32664 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1105 of 2019 1 - (Deleted) Smt. Mahendra Kaur (Died) (As Per Honble Court Order Dated 10-01- 2025) 2 - Smt. Paramjeet Kaur W/o Late Gurumel Singh Siddhu Aged About 57 Years, 3 - Karan Singh Siddhu S/o Late Gurumel Singh
CGHC010401812019
2026:CGHC:32664
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCC No. 1105 of 2019
1 - (Deleted) Smt. Mahendra Kaur (Died) (As Per Honble Court Order Dated 10-01-
2 - Smt. Paramjeet Kaur W/o Late Gurumel Singh Siddhu Aged About 57 Years, 3 - Karan Singh Siddhu S/o Late Gurumel Singh Siddhu Aged About 32 Years, 4 - Kumari Gurleen Kaur Siddhu D/o Late Gurumel Singh Siddhu Aged About 57
Years
5 - Charanjeet Kaur Siddhu D/o Late Sardar Krishna Singh Aged About 72 Years 6 - Ravi Singh Siddhu S/o Late Sardar Krishna Singh Aged About 52 Years , All are Legal Representatives Of Deceased Plaintiff Sardar Krishna Singh and all are R/o Sardar Road, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh.
... Applicants
versus
1 - Smt. Chandra Prabha Gupta W/o Late Surendra Nath Gupta Aged About 68
Years,
2 - Smt. Sashi Prabha Gupta D/o Late Surendra Nath Gupta Aged About 48 Years, 3 - Smt. Ratna Prabha Gupta D/o Late Surendra Nath Gupta Aged About 45 Years.
4 - Smt. Satya Prabha Gupta D/o Late Surendra Nath Gupta Aged About 40 Years.
5 - Vinod Kumar Gupta S/o Late Surendra Nath Gupta Aged About 40 Years.
6 - Smt. Geeta Gupta D/o Late Surendra Nath Gupta Aged About 36 Years, Non-applicants No. 1 to 6 are Legal Heirs Of Deceased Defendant No. 1 Surendra Nath Gupta and all are R/o Surajpur, Village And Post And District Surajpur Chhattisgarh.
7 - Smt. Shanti Gupta W/o Late Harish Chandra Gupta Aged About 55 Years.
8 - Vaibhav Gupta S/o Late Harish Chandra Gupta Aged About 50 Years.
9 - Ravindra Gupta S/o Late Harish Chandra Gupta Aged About 50 Years.
10 - Pradeep Kumar Gupta S/o Late Harish Chandra Gupta Aged About 45 Years Non-applicants No. 7 to 10 are Legal Heirs Of Deceased Defendant Satish Chandra Gupta and all R/o Bilaspur, Gupta Stationary Mart, Tilak Nagar Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
11 - (Deleted) Smt. Munni Devi (Died) (As Per Honble Court Order Dated 10-01-
12 - Smt. Indu D/o Late Sushil Kumar Gupta Aged About 52 Years, 13 - Pramod Kumar Gupta S/o Late Sushil Kumar Gupta Aged About 47 Years.
14 - Anju Gupta D/o Late Sushil Kumar Gupta Aged About 41 Years, Non-applicants No. 11 to 14 are Legal Heirs Of Deceased Defendant Sushil Kumar Gupta and all are R/o Kedarpur, Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh.
15 - Smt. Uma Gupta W/o Late Naresh Chandra Gupta Aged About 60 Years, R/o Deviganj Road, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh.
16 - (Deleted) Bhairav Prasad Gupta (Died) (As Per Honble Court Order Dated 10- 01-2025)
17 - Smt. Kusum Gupta W/o Late Shiv Prasad Gupta Aged About 40 Years, R/o Simora District Mandla Madhya Pradesh.
18 - Smt. Sharda Gupta W/o Late Rajendra Prasad Gupta Aged About 31 Years, R/o Kalibarh Road, Mahaal, Nagpur, Maharastra.
Non-applicants No. 15 to 18 are Legal Heirs Of Deceased Defendant Naresh Gupta, District Nagpur, Maharastra.
19 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Surguja, District Surguja Chhattisgarh.
... Non-applicants
For Applicants
:
Ms. Kaushaki Kumari, Advocate on behalf
of Shri B.P. Sharma, Advocate.
For Non-applicants No. 1,3,4
and 6
:
None, though served through paper
publication.
For Non-applicants No. 2, 5
and 12 to 14
:
Shri Akath Kumar Yadav, Advocate.
For Non-applicants No.7 to 10
:
None, though served.
For Non-applicants No.15,17
and 18
:
Notice was not issued.
For Non-applicant No.19/State
:
Shri Akhilesh Kumar, Govt. Advocate.
SB: Hon'ble Shri Justic
e Sanjay S. Agrawal
Order on Board
29/07/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard on admission.
2. This petition has been filed for restoration of F.A.No.376/2019, which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 18/11/2019.
3. On due consideration and for the reason assigned in the petition, which is duly supported by an affidavit, I am inclined to allow the same. The petition is, accordingly, allowed and F.A.No.376/2019 is directed to be restored to its original number. No order as to cost.
Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal)
JUDGE Kamde