Chhattisgarh High Court

MCC/1105/2019 of (DELETED) SMT. MAHENDRA KAUR (DIED) Vs SMT. CHANDRA PRABHA GUPTA on 28 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026:CGHC:32664 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1105 of 2019 1 - (Deleted) Smt. Mahendra Kaur (Died) (As Per Honble Court Order Dated 10-01- 2025) 2 - Smt. Paramjeet Kaur W/o Late Gurumel Singh Siddhu Aged About 57 Years, 3 - Karan Singh Siddhu S/o Late Gurumel Singh

CGHC010401812019

2026:CGHC:32664

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

MCC No. 1105 of 2019

1 - (Deleted) Smt. Mahendra Kaur (Died) (As Per Honble Court Order Dated 10-01-

2 - Smt. Paramjeet Kaur W/o Late Gurumel Singh Siddhu Aged About 57 Years, 3 - Karan Singh Siddhu S/o Late Gurumel Singh Siddhu Aged About 32 Years, 4 - Kumari Gurleen Kaur Siddhu D/o Late Gurumel Singh Siddhu Aged About 57

Years

5 - Charanjeet Kaur Siddhu D/o Late Sardar Krishna Singh Aged About 72 Years 6 - Ravi Singh Siddhu S/o Late Sardar Krishna Singh Aged About 52 Years , All are Legal Representatives Of Deceased Plaintiff Sardar Krishna Singh and all are R/o Sardar Road, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

... Applicants

versus

1 - Smt. Chandra Prabha Gupta W/o Late Surendra Nath Gupta Aged About 68

Years,

2 - Smt. Sashi Prabha Gupta D/o Late Surendra Nath Gupta Aged About 48 Years, 3 - Smt. Ratna Prabha Gupta D/o Late Surendra Nath Gupta Aged About 45 Years.

4 - Smt. Satya Prabha Gupta D/o Late Surendra Nath Gupta Aged About 40 Years.

5 - Vinod Kumar Gupta S/o Late Surendra Nath Gupta Aged About 40 Years.

6 - Smt. Geeta Gupta D/o Late Surendra Nath Gupta Aged About 36 Years, Non-applicants No. 1 to 6 are Legal Heirs Of Deceased Defendant No. 1 Surendra Nath Gupta and all are R/o Surajpur, Village And Post And District Surajpur Chhattisgarh.

7 - Smt. Shanti Gupta W/o Late Harish Chandra Gupta Aged About 55 Years.

8 - Vaibhav Gupta S/o Late Harish Chandra Gupta Aged About 50 Years.

9 - Ravindra Gupta S/o Late Harish Chandra Gupta Aged About 50 Years.

10 - Pradeep Kumar Gupta S/o Late Harish Chandra Gupta Aged About 45 Years Non-applicants No. 7 to 10 are Legal Heirs Of Deceased Defendant Satish Chandra Gupta and all R/o Bilaspur, Gupta Stationary Mart, Tilak Nagar Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

11 - (Deleted) Smt. Munni Devi (Died) (As Per Honble Court Order Dated 10-01-

12 - Smt. Indu D/o Late Sushil Kumar Gupta Aged About 52 Years, 13 - Pramod Kumar Gupta S/o Late Sushil Kumar Gupta Aged About 47 Years.

14 - Anju Gupta D/o Late Sushil Kumar Gupta Aged About 41 Years, Non-applicants No. 11 to 14 are Legal Heirs Of Deceased Defendant Sushil Kumar Gupta and all are R/o Kedarpur, Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

15 - Smt. Uma Gupta W/o Late Naresh Chandra Gupta Aged About 60 Years, R/o Deviganj Road, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

16 - (Deleted) Bhairav Prasad Gupta (Died) (As Per Honble Court Order Dated 10- 01-2025)

17 - Smt. Kusum Gupta W/o Late Shiv Prasad Gupta Aged About 40 Years, R/o Simora District Mandla Madhya Pradesh.

18 - Smt. Sharda Gupta W/o Late Rajendra Prasad Gupta Aged About 31 Years, R/o Kalibarh Road, Mahaal, Nagpur, Maharastra.

Non-applicants No. 15 to 18 are Legal Heirs Of Deceased Defendant Naresh Gupta, District Nagpur, Maharastra.

19 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Surguja, District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

... Non-applicants

For Applicants

:

Ms. Kaushaki Kumari, Advocate on behalf

of Shri B.P. Sharma, Advocate.

For Non-applicants No. 1,3,4

and 6

:

None, though served through paper

publication.

For Non-applicants No. 2, 5

and 12 to 14

:

Shri Akath Kumar Yadav, Advocate.

For Non-applicants No.7 to 10

:

None, though served.

For Non-applicants No.15,17

and 18

:

Notice was not issued.

For Non-applicant No.19/State

:

Shri Akhilesh Kumar, Govt. Advocate.

SB: Hon'ble Shri Justic

e Sanjay S. Agrawal

Order on Board

29/07/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard on admission.

2. This petition has been filed for restoration of F.A.No.376/2019, which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 18/11/2019.

3. On due consideration and for the reason assigned in the petition, which is duly supported by an affidavit, I am inclined to allow the same. The petition is, accordingly, allowed and F.A.No.376/2019 is directed to be restored to its original number. No order as to cost.

Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal)

JUDGE Kamde

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead