Chhattisgarh High Court
MCRC/4353/2026 of HIMANSU KUMAR YADAV Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 26 July 2026
2026:CGHC:31950 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 4353 of 2026 Himansu Kumar Yadav S/o Tiritram Yadav Aged About 23 Years R/o- Police Station Bankimongra District -Korba C.G. ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer, Police Station-
CGHC010175492026
2026:CGHC:31950
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRC No. 4353 of 2026
Himansu Kumar Yadav S/o Tiritram Yadav Aged About 23 Years R/o- Police Station Bankimongra District -Korba C.G.
... Applicant
versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer, Police Station- Bankimongra, District Korba -C.G.
... Non-Applicant
For Applicant
:
Shri Virendra Verma, Advocate.
For Non-Applicant/State
:
Shri Afroj Khan, Panel Lawyer
(HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL)
Order on Board
27/07/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, the B.N.S.S.) for grant of regular bail to the applicants who have been arrested in connection with Crime No.119/2025 registered at Police Station Bankimongra, District Korgba (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Sections 103
(1) of Bhartiya Nyay Samhita, 2023 (for short, the BNS).
2. As per the prosecution’s case, on 15.06.2025 at 1.00 am, the applicant called the informant Ramkumar Yadav who rushed the spot and found the applicant shouting that his father had been killed and subsequently the applicant admitted that he had stabbed his father to death after an altercation over food, being frustrated by his father’s habitual quarrels and alcoholism. Later on, the informant Ramkumar Yadav lodged an F.I.R. at Bankimogra Police Station. Based on this, offence under the aforesaid section has been registered against the present applicant.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has not committed any offence and was falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the applicant is in jail since 15.06.2025 and that, trial is going on and it may take some considerable time to conclude. On these premises, he prays for the grant of regular bail to the applicant.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application and submits that the applicant/accused has committed the murder of his father as he is residing with his father in the same house. As per the memorandum statement of the applicant, bloodstained knife, which was used to commit the crime, and bloodstained cloth were also seized from the applicant, therefore, the applicant does not deserve regular bail.
5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary.
6. Taking into consideration the entire facts and circumstances of the case and material available on record and looking to gravity of the offence and taking into account that the trial is going on, without entering into merits of the case, I am not inclined to release the applicant on bail.
7. Accordingly, the application filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is rejected.
8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/-
(Radhakishan Agrawal)
JUDGE Anjani