Chhattisgarh High Court
ACQA/100/2026 of DHANI RAM SAHU Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 14 July 2026
2026:CGHC:29874-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 100 of 2026 • Dhani Ram Sahu S/o Late Shree Sant Ram Sahu Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Khurdur, Police Station Kota, Distt Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Appellant/Complainant versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh
CGHC010200212026
2026:CGHC:29874-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
ACQA No. 100 of 2026
•
Dhani Ram Sahu S/o Late Shree Sant Ram Sahu Aged About 49
Years R/o Village Khurdur, Police Station Kota, Distt Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
... Appellant/Complainant
versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
2. Vinod @ Lalu S/o Budhram Sahu Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Khurdur, Police Station Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
3. Manoj S/o Budhram Sahu Aged About 46 Years R/o Village Khurdur, Police Station Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
4. Murli Manohar S/o Mangturam Sahu Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Khurdur, Police Station Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ishan Verma, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 /State : Mr. Vinod Tekam, Government Advocate D.B.:- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal
&
Hon'ble Shri Justice
Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board 15.07.2026
1. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the impugned judgment dated 05.01.2021 passed by the learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Bilaspur in Sessions Trial No. 05/2019
has already been affirmed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 08.10.2025 in Acquittal Appeal No. 99 of 2021, preferred by the State.
2. In view of the aforesaid fact, we are not inclined to entertain the instant appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge
Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish