Chhattisgarh High Court
CRMP/943/2021 of LUKESH KUMAR SAHU Vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH on 28 June 2026
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 943 of 2021 1 - Lukesh Kumar Sahu, S/o Shri Mangalu Ram Sahu, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Behind Shri Durga Manch, Junwani, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Station House
2026:CGHC:26394
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRMP No. 943 of 2021
1 - Lukesh Kumar Sahu, S/o Shri Mangalu Ram Sahu, Aged About 34
Years, R/o Behind Shri Durga Manch, Junwani, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State of Chhattisgarh, Through: Station House Officer, Police Station Mahila Thana Durg, District- Durg (C.G.), 2 - Vijay Laxmi Sahu, D/o Shri Keval Anand Sahu, Aged About 30
Years, R/o Village Mohandi, Post Nardha, Tahsil Dhamdha, District- Durg (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
(Cause title taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. G.P. Kurre, Advocate
For Respondent No.1/
State
:
Mr. Ashish Shukla, Additional Advocate
General
Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Smt. Rajani Dubey
, Judge
Order on Board
Per
Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
.06.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. G.P. Kurre, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Ashish Shukla, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for the State/respondent No. 1.
2. The petitioner has filed the present petition for the following relief:- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the bearing FIR bearing Crime No.0/2013 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, District Durg (C.G.), in the interest of justice.”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has become infructuous since the trial has concluded and the accused/petitioner has been acquitted of the charges under Sections 498-A and 34 of the IPC. Accordingly, nothing survives for consideration in the present petition.
4. Considering the aforesaid submission, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- Sd/-
(Rajani Dubey)
(Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Ruchi RUCHI YADAV Digitally signed by RUCHI YADAV