Armed Forces Tribunal
Ex Sub Maj Ashok Kumar (Army) vs UOI & Others on 5 February 2026
**ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, JAIPUR**
13.
**OA No 546/2021**
JC-374020F Ex Sub Maj Ashok Kumar, S/o Shri Amar Chand, Village-Taunsa, Post-Majra, Tehsil-Balachaur, Distt-Shahid Bhagat Singh Nagar, Punjab, At present R/o D-162, Prem Nagar, Jhotwara, Jaipur (Raj) - 302012 .... Applicant
Versus
1. 1. The Union of India, through the Secretary to the Govt of India, Ministry of Defence, South Block, New Delhi
2. 2. PCDA (P), Allahabad (UP) – 211014
3. 3. The OIC Records, The Records Signals PIN-908770, C/o 56APO
.... Respondents

सत्यमेव जयते
For Applicant : Mr Yogendra Singh/Sunil Kumar, Advocates For Respondents : Mr Arun Kumar, Advocate
**CORAM :**
**HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR, MEMBER (J)
HON'BLE MR. SANJIV MITTAL, MEMBER (A)**
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
**ORDER
05.02.2026**
1. By way of this Application under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act 2007, the Applicant has filed this OA, praying to direct the Respondents to grant Group 'X' Pay to him @ Rs. 6200/- pm instead of Rs. 3600/- pm wef 01.01.2016 and consequential pension and pensionary benefits and that the arrears be paid along with interest @ 18% per annum.
2. Brief facts of the case as enunciated by the Applicant is that the Applicant was initially enrolled in the Army on 21.10.1988 in Group "Y" and after rendering more than 32 years of service, he was discharged from service on 31.10.2020 in Group "X" on completion of his terms of engagement. While in service, the Applicant passed diploma course in trade JC (Sys) which is duly approved by All India Counsel for Technical Education (AICTE) and was placed in Group "X" from the date of passing the diploma in JE (Sys) and, accordingly, was granted Group "X" Pay. On implementation of 7<sup>th</sup> CPC, the Respondent authorities created class in class in existing Group "X" Pay and created two categories in Group "X", ie., one which is recognized by AICTE and second which is not recognized by the AICTE and, accordingly, granted higher rate of Group "X" pay @ Rs. 6200/- pm and lower rate of Group "X" Pay @ Rs. 3600/- pm respectively wef 01.01.2016, without recognizing the fact that all the personnel have passed the same diploma course and performed same duties and were also getting equal pay before 01.01.2016. The Applicant has submitted that before academic year 2002-2003, the diploma course was not recognized by the AICTE and all the personnel were granted uniform rate of Group "X" Pay. Further, even after recognition of the diploma course by the AICTE, the same is being conducted by the same institution ie., Military College of Technical Education (MCTE), wherein the number of vacancies are neither fixed nor the AICTE is conducting any entrance examination for admission in diploma course. The Applicant made representations and also issued Legal Notice through his Counsel for grant of higher rate of Group "X" Pay @ Rs. 6200/- pm wef 01.01.2016 and consequential pension and pensionary benefits, but to no avail. Therefore, the aggrieved Applicant has filed the OA.
3. The Respondents have filed Reply Statement and while not disputing the basic facts presented by the Applicant, they have submitted that the Applicant was initially enrolled in the Army in Group "Y" and further re-mustered as JE Sys (Yeoman of Signals) in Group "X" on 01.06.2001 on completion of Yeoman Signals Course. AICTE has accorded approval to various institutions under the Army to conduct diploma program in Engineering/Technology wef the academic year 2002-2003 vide their letter dt 13.03.2003 (Annexure R/2). As per 6<sup>th</sup> CPC, the JE (Sys) qualified personnel were granted Group "X" Pay @ Rs. 1400/- pm and on implementation of 7<sup>th</sup> CPC wef 01.01.2016, Group "X" Pay has been divided into two segments, ie., a higher rate of Rs. 6200/- pm for Group "X"
trades which requires a qualification equivalent to a diploma recognized by AICTE and a lower rate of Rs. 3600/- pm for other Group "X" trades, but not having a technical qualification recognized by AICTE vide Para 5 (3) (ii) of Notification of Ministry of Defence, Army Pay Rules, 2017. As per Para 5(3) of (iii) & (iv) of Gazette of India dt 03.05.2017, "*when a JCO/OR in relevant Group "X" trades drawing a lower rate of Group "X" Pay acquires a higher technical qualification equivalent of a diploma recognized by AICTE, he shall be admissible to higher rate of Group "X" Pay with the approval of concerned Competent Authority and when a JCO/OR is re-mustered from Group "Y" to Group "X", he shall be admissible for Group "X" Pay as sub Clause (ii).*" A case was also taken up with MoD for obtaining sanction of the Competent Financial Authority for grant of higher rate of Group "X" Pay to all the personnel who have acquired the same training/technical expertise prior to academic year 2002-2003 and performing the same task, however, the same was turned down by IHQ of MoD (Army) vide letter dt 25.10.2021 on the grounds that no provision existed to provide a diploma course certificate in retrospect to the JCOs/OR who have qualified re-mustering course prior to academic year 2002-2003 and no provisions for grant of diploma by AICTE were in existence. In view of the aforesaid facts, the Respondents have reiterated that higher rate of Group "X" is admissible for those personnel only who have passed AICTE recognized diploma courses from academic year 2002-2003 onwards. The OA is devoid of merit and deserve to be dismissed.
4. We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the material placed before us.
5. Perusal of AICTE letter of approval dated 13.03.2003 reveals that the AICTE has accorded approval to various institutions under the Army to conduct Diploma Programmes in Engineering/Technology wef academic year 2002-2003 and each Diploma Course has been allotted a maximum permissible annual intake. Ministry of Defence Notification dated 03.05.2017 also provides that the levels for same ranks in trade Group "X" and trade Group "Y" shall be the same. Group "X" Pay shall be admissible on drawal of pay in the prescribed level, ie., at a higher rate of Rs. 6200/- for Group "X" trades which requires a qualification equivalent to a diploma recognized by AICTE and a lower rate of Rs. 3600/- for other Group "X" trades but not having a technical qualification recognized by AICTE. In the present case, the JE (Sys) diploma course passed by the Applicant is recognized by the AICTE, but he has passed the same course before academic year 2002-2003 and, hence, he has not been issued Diploma Certificate by the AICTE and, hence, in the absence of Diploma certificate issued by AICTE, he is not being granted higher rate of Group "X" Pay wef 01.01.2016. The case processed with IHQ of MoD (Army) for grant of uniform higher rate of Group "X" Pay to all the personnel passed the JE (Sys) Diploma Course from MCTE, prior to academic year 2002-2003 was turned down by IHQ of MoD (Army) on 25.10.2021.
6. The Integrated Headquarters of Ministry of Defence (Army) vide their letter dt 25.10.2021 have already decided that since those who acquired higher qualification prior to the Academic Year 2002-03 and their diploma was not recognized by AICTE, as AICTE approval was wef academic session 2002-03, no retrospective implementation of the 7<sup>th</sup> CPC recommendations regarding higher pay to those whose diploma was recognized/approved by AICTE was consequent to approval accorded by AICTE, the diplomas are being issued duly recognized by AICTE. It has not been made clear that by the Applicant herein that he had acquired higher education prior to 2002-03 or afterwards after the approval of AICTE was received in the year 2003. However, the Respondents have stated that he had done this course during 1998-99 and thus he was ineligible for grant of higher pay as his diploma was not recognized by AICTE (Annexure R/1). If the Applicant had acquired the qualification prior to 2002-03, obviously, he is not eligible for higher Group 'X' wef 01.01.2016.
7. Taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the Applicant has passed the JE (Sys) Diploma Course from the same institution, ie., MCTE, we direct the Respondents to reconsider the case of the Applicant for grant of higher rate of Group "X" Pay wef 01.01.2016 equal to all those personnel who have passed the diploma course after 2002-03 from these institutions or otherwise as the approval of AICTE was wef academic year 2002-03 and no diploma(s) can be recognized by AICTE on retrospective basis, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this Order. The outcome thereof, shall be intimated to the Applicants.
8. The OA is disposed off, accordingly. Pending Miscellaneous Application(s), if any, also stand disposed off.
9. No order on costs.
Sd/-XXX
(SANJIV MITTAL) MEMBER (A)
Ssy/-
Sd/-XXX
(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR) MEMBER (J)

यतो न्यायः ततो जयः