Armed Forces Tribunal

UOI & Others vs Ex Ris Raghunath Singh Ranwa (Army) on 14 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, JAIPUR

10.

MA 662/2022 in OA 795/2018

UOI & Others

…. Applicants

Versus

JC-194153 Ex Ris (Hony Lt) Raghunath Singh Ranwan

…. Respondent

For Applicants

: Mr. Gajendra Sharma, Advocate

For Respondent

: Mr. Tansukh Rai, Advocate

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR, MEMBER (J)

HON’BLE MR. SANJIV MITTAL, MEMBER (A)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

14.07.2026

1. Union of India has filed this MA, praying for modification of Order dated 26/4/2022 in the light of Govt of India, Ministry of Defence letter dated 05/9/2017, on the ground that the applicant is entitled for grant of benefits of broadbandingwef 01/1/2016 instead of from the date of discharge of the applicant.

2. We have heard the counsels for the parties and perused the material on record.

3. Vide Order dated 26/4/2022 in OA No 795/2018 in the case of Ex Ris (Hony Lt) Raghunath Singh Ranwan Vs UOI &Ors, this Tribunal had directed the Respondents to grant disability element in addition to service pension which had already been granted to the applicant despite his disability being neither attributable to nor aggravated by military service and rounding off of disability element from 20% to 50% wef 01/1/2001, ie, from the date of discharge of the applicant for a period of two years within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order and in default, interest @ 8% per annum on the amount of arrears till the date of actual payment.

2

4. Subsequent to passing of ibid Order, the issue with regard to grant of broadbanding benefits of disability element of disability pension has been settled by the Hon’ble Apex Court vide its Judgment dated 12/2/2026 in the case of Union of India through its Secretary &Ors Vs Sgt Girish Kumar &Orsetc, in Civil Appeal Nos 6820-6824 of 2018, alongwith other Civil Appeals. The case of the applicant is also covered by the aforesaid judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court.

5. In view of the foregoing, Respondents are directed to take necessary steps in granting relief to the applicant as has been ordered by this Tribunal vide Order dated 26/4/2022 for a period of two years from the date of discharge of the Applicant as assessed by the RMB in the light of Judgment dated 12/2/2026 passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court (supra) within a period of four monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.

6. MA No 662/2022 seeking modification of Order dated 26/4/2022 is accordingly disposed off. File be consigned to record.

(SANJIV MITTAL)

(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR) MEMBER (A)

MEMBER (J)

cda/-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead