Armed Forces Tribunal
Smt Sajna Devi WdO Rect Jhutha Ram vs UOI & Others on 29 April 2026
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, JAIPUR
4.
MA (E) 52/2023 in OA 459/2022
Smt Sajna Devi, wd/o
Late Rect Jhutha Ram (1035949)
…. Applicant
Versus
UOI & Others
…. Respondents
For Applicant
: Mr DR Choudhary, Proxy for
Mr. Yogendra Singh, Sunil Kumar, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Pyare Lal, Advocate (R1-3)
: Mr. Mahipal Singh Shekhawat, Advocate (R4&5)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR, MEMBER (J)
HON’BLE MR. SANJIV MITTAL, MEMBER (A)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
29.04.2026
1. During the course of hearing, Senior Panel Consel for the Respondents submits that it is not in dispute that full compliance in accordance with the Order of the Tribunal and as perextant policy on the subjecthas been done and nothing remains on their part. In support of his contention, Senior Panel Counsel has placed on record a copy of calculation sheet, wherein arrears of Rs 96,338/- has been worked out and paid to the applicant, which is taken on record. Further, it is apparent from record that the Respondents had also filed a compliance report on 07/10/2025, wherein it was stated that PPO dated 20/12/2024, in pursuance of Order dated 14/12/2022 passed by this Tribunal, has been issued, granting life time arrears of service element of husband of the applicant wef 01/12/1966 till his demise on 27/7/1992 and thereafter, family pension to the applicant wef 28/7/1992 till widowhood, which is also on record.Contra, Proxy counsel for the applicant controverts the statement made by the Senior Panel Counsel and submits that it is not compliance in toto.
2
2. Taking note of overall facts and circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to dispose off this Application, having been rendered infructuous. However, in case the applicant has any grievance with regard to compliance done and payment received by her, she shall be at liberty to approach this Tribunal de novo, if so desired.
(SANJIV MITTAL)
(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR) MEMBER (A)
MEMBER (J)
cda/-