Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal
TELECOM WATCHDOG vs BHARTI CELLULAR LIMITED on 18 July 2002
5/21/2018
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
file:///D:/TDSAT%20ALL%20WEB%20SIDE%20OLD%20BACKUP/JUDGEMANT%20TDSAT/all%20judgement%20year%20wise/judgement%202002/Petition%20No TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
NEW DELHI
DATED 18TH JULY, 2002
PETITION No.6 OF 2002
(M.A.No. 16 of 2002)
Telecom Watchdog …
Petitioner
Vs
Bharti Cellular Ltd. & another …
Respondents
BEFORE:
HON’BLE MR. SUHAS C. SEN
CHAIRPERSON
MR.R.U.S.PRASAD, MEMBER
MR.P.R.DASGUPTA, MEMBER
For Petitioners
:
Mr. Anil Kumar,Secretary Telecom Watchdog For Respondent- 1,2 & 3
:
Mr.C.S.Vaidyanathan, Sr. Advocate with Mr.
A.K.Roy,Mr.Manjul Bajpai,
Mr.Kashi Visweshwar,Advocates
For Respondent No.4
:
Mr.Meet Malhotra.Advocate
For Respondent No.5
:
Mr.Navin Chawla,Advocate
Delay - alleged incorrect bills pertaining to the period 1996, 1997 and 1998 issue cannot be raised in 2002 - stale cases – petition dismissed.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The petitioner has produced certain bills relating to the period 1996, 1997 and 1998 and states that the charges levied by the cellular operators are excessive. These are stale cases. An attempt was made to activate TRAI on these very complaints. TRAI, however, did not grant any relief. The petition is grossly delayed and cannot be entertained.
The petition is dismissed.. ……Sd/-………..J (Suhas C. Sen) Chairperson
……Sd/-………… (R.U.S. Prasad) Member
………Sd/-…………. (P.R. Dasgupta) Member