Armed Forces Tribunal
Smt Bay Kaur wdo Late Hony Lt Mani Ram vs UOI & Others on 24 February 2026
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, JAIPUR
14.
MA (E) 64/2024 in OA 278/2012
Smt Bay Kaur, wd/o Late Hony Lt Mani Ram
…. Applicant
Versus
UOI & Others
…. Respondents
For Applicant
: Mr Sunil Kumar, Advocate
For Respondents
: Mr Pyare Lal, Proxy for
Mr OP Jhajhria, Advocate
Mr Mahipal Singh Shekhawat, Advocate (PDA)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR, MEMBER (J)
HON’BLE MR. SANJIV MITTAL, MEMBER (A)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
03.09.2025
1. During the course of hearing, Senior Panel Counsel appearing for the Respondents submits that PPO in pursuance of Order passed by this Tribunal has already been issued and nothing remains on their part. He has also placed on record a copy of the e- PPO dated 31/7/2025 issued in this regard. Contra to the statement of the Senior Panel counsel, counsel for the applicant submits that relief has so far not been paid to the applicant.
2. In this regard, Counsel for the Respondents PDA appears virtually and submits that PDA Bank has nothing to do with this matter and the DPDO, Bhiwani, Haryana is the PDA concerned in this matter. Senior Panel Counsel undertakes to resolve the issue within a period eight weeks.
3. In view of the foregoing, we grant eight weeks’ further time to the Respondents and direct them to resolve the issue expeditiously and grant benefit to the applicant within eight weeks.
4. With the above directions, MA (E) is disposed off. File be consigned to record.
(SANJIV MITTAL)
(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR) MEMBER (A)
MEMBER (J)
cda/-