Armed Forces Tribunal
Ex Gnr Mahendra Singh Shekhawat vs UOI & Others on 6 February 2026
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, JAIPUR
1.
OA 24/2026
Ex Gnr Mahendra Singh Shekhawat
…. Applicant
Versus
UOI & Others
…. Respondents
For Applicant
: Ms. Anjali Minocha, Advocate
For Respondents
: Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocate
Major Vishi Singh, OIC Legal Cell, HQ 61 Sub Area alongwith MA(E) 65/2024 in OA(A) 11/2010
Ex Gnr Mahendra Singh Shekhawat
…. Applicant
Versus
UOI & Others
…. Respondents
For Applicant
: Mr. Amit Ojha, Advocate
For Respondents
: Mr. Sandeep Garssa, Advocate
Major Vishi Singh, OIC Legal Cell, HQ 61 Sub Area alongwith
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR, MEMBER (J)
HON’BLE MR. SANJIV MITTAL, MEMBER (A)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
06.02.2026
OA No 24/2026
1. Issue Notice. Mr Abhishek Singh, Advocate accepts Notice on behalf of the Respondents. Let Counter Affidavit be filed within 21 weeks. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within seven weeks thereafter.
2. List the matter in its own turn after completion of pleadings.
2
MA (E) No 65/2024 in OA (Appeal) No 11/2010
3. During the course of hearing, while counsel for the Applicant is not present, we have heard the counsels for the Respondents and perused the material on record.
4. Counsel for the Applicant has filed this Execution Application for execution of Order dated 03/5/2024 passed by this Tribunal in OA (A) No 11/2010, vide which Respondents were directed to take a decision with regard to the plea of the applicant based on a fresh representation from the applicant as it had been submitted by the applicant that relief had been granted to a similar case of Ramesh Maru resulting in OA No 882/2010 in the AFT, Regional Bench, Chandigarh being rendered infructuous.
5. Counsel for the Respondents submits that Order ibid has been complied with by Respondents and nothing remains on their part. In support of his arguments, counsel for the Respondents had already placed on record a copy of the Order issued in by this regard by Competent Authority during the course of hearing held on 16/12/2025, a copy of which had also been supplied to the counsel for the applicant.
6. In view of the compliance having been done by the Respondents and fresh Representation submitted by the applicant has been rejected by the competent authority finding no merit, this application has become infructuous and file be consigned to record.
(SANJIV MITTAL)
(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR) MEMBER (A)
MEMBER (J)
cda/-