Armed Forces Tribunal
Rfn Zhabar Singh Bhati vs UOI & Others on 2 February 2026
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, JAIPUR
25.
OA 103/2024 with MA 368/2024
No-12877416H Rfn Zhabar Singh Bhati, S/o Sh. Birbal Singh Bhati, R/o VPO-Parewar, Tehsil & Distt-Jaisalmer (Raj)
…. Applicant
Versus
1.
2.
3.
Alongwith
OA 104/2024
No-12877201K Rfn Suresh Kumar, S/o Sh. Birbal Ram, R/o VPO-Bhatiwar, Tehsil-Udaipurwati, Distt-Jhunuhunu (Raj)
…. Applicant
Versus
1.
2.
3.
No-12877336L Rfn Tara Chand, S/o Sh. Ganpat Ram, R/o VPO-Toliyasar, Tehsil-Sujangarh, Distt-Churu (Raj)
…. Applicant
Versus
1.
2.
3.
No-12877673A Rfn Leeladhar Lochib, S/o Sh. Sheyochand Ram, R/o VPO-Napawali, Teh-Neem Ka Thana, Distt-Sikar (Raj)
…. Applicant
Versus
1.
2.
3.
(1) No-12877347X Rfn Mahendra Singh Shekhawat, S/o Sh. Karan Singyh, R/o VPO-Kotiya, Tehsil-Fatehpur, Distt-Sikar (Raj)
(2) No-12877573P Rfn Ranveer Singh Dariya, S/o Sh. Heera Ram, R/o VPO-Jaipuriya Khalsa, Tehsil-Taranagar, Distt-Churu (Raj)
(3) No- 12877397H Rfn Babulal, S/o Sh. Ram Kumar Singh, R/o VPO-Palthana, Tehsil & Distt-Sikar (Raj)
…. Applicants
Versus
1.
2.
3.
No-12877568K Rfn Sumer Singh, S/o Sh. Laxman Singh, R/o VPO-Patusari, Tehsil & Distt-Jhunuhunu (Raj)
…. Applicant
Versus
1.
2.
3.
: Mr. Gajendra Sharma, Advocate
OA 109/2024
No-12877650Y Rfn Rohitashwa, S/o Sh. Kulda Ram, R/o VPO-Thali, Tehsil-Buhana, Distt-Jhunjhunu (Raj)
…. Applicant
Versus
1.
2.
3.
: Mr. Gajendra Sharma, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR, MEMBER (J)
HON’BLE MR. SANJIV MITTAL, MEMBER (A)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
02.02.2026
1. By way of this Application under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act 2007, the Applicant has prayed for directing the Respondents to allow the Applicants to continue in service till attainment of age of 55 years in pursuance of letter dt 05.01.1996 and TA Act of 1948 and TA Rules and Regulations.
2. During the course of arguments, Learned Counsel for the Respondents submits that since the Applicants have already been discharged from Service in accordance with the policy, the OAs have become infructuous. However, if they want to get Discharge Certificates for the service rendered in TA (Eco), the same shall be provided to them, if the Hon’ble Tribunal pass Order to the Respondents. Proxy Counsel for the Applicant raised no objection to the statement made at Bar by the Learned Counsel for the Respondents.
3. In view of the above, we direct the Respondents to issue Discharge Certificates to the Applicants within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this Order in terms of extant rules/regulations and policies governing service rendered by military personnel in TA Eco Task Forces.
4. The OAs are disposed off accordingly. Pending Miscellaneous Application(s), if any, also stand disposed off.
(SANJIV MITTAL)
(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR) MEMBER (A)
MEMBER (J)
Ssy/-