Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal
FASTWAY TRANSMISSIONS PVT LTD vs 9X MEDIA PVT LTD AND ORS. on 29 September 2026
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
NEW DELHI
Dated:
29/09/2026
BROADCASTING PETITION/444/2024
WITH
MISC APPLICATION/445/2025
WITH
MISC APPLICATION/446/2025
WITH
MISC APPLICATION/447/2025
Petitioner Name:
Fastway Transmissions Pvt Ltd
Versus
Respondent Name: 9x Media Pvt Ltd And Ors.
BROADCASTING PETITION/445/2024WithMISC APPLICATION/455/2025WithMISC APPLICATION/456/2025WithMISC APPLICATION/457/2025
Fastway Media Cable Network Pvt. Ltd.
....Petitioner
Versus
9x Media Pvt Ltd And Ors.
....Respondent
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRUBHAI NARANBHAI PATEL, CHAIRPERSON
HON'BLE DR. SANJEEV BANZAL ,MEMBER
For Applicants/Appellants/
Petitioners Advocate
Mr. Vibhav SrivastavaMs. Aashi Arora
For Respondents Advocate
Ms. Aanchal TandonMr. Tarun MehtaMs. Niharika Sharma ( For All Respondents)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
1. Learned counsel for respondent no.1 submitted that they have already filed their reply in both the aforesaid Broadcasting Petitions, copies whereof have been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner in both the aforesaid Broadcasting Petitions is seeking four weeks' time to file rejoinder affidavit, which is granted.
3. Learned counsel for respondent no.1 submitted that as such respondent no.3 is not necessary party at all. There are no averments or allegations against respondent nos.2, 3 & 4. Nonetheless, it is submitted that at a proper stage they will argue out the MAs preferred in both the aforesaid Broadcasting Petitions for deletion of respondent nos. 2, 3 & 4 as parties from these Broadcasting Petitions.
4. Learned counsel for respondent no.1 submitted that respondent no.1 is made party and they have already filed their reply and, therefore, at this stage respondent no.1 has no reason to file separate reply on behalf of the Directors who are respondent nos. 2, 3 & 4.
5. These matters shall be listed before the Court of Registrar for framing of issues and taking evidences on 20.11.2026.
( JUSTICE D. N. PATEL)CHAIRPERSON
( DR. SANJEEV BANZAL)MEMBER
/AS/