Central Government Industrial Tribunal

Sh. Anil Kumar Rathore vs Air India Ltd on 6 October 2026

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM –

LABOUR COURT NO. II, NEW DELHI

Sh. Anil Kumar Rathore & O4 Ors.

Through- Janwadi General Kamgar Mazdoor Union Room No. 95, Barrack No. 1/10, Jam Nagar House, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi-110001.

…Applicant/Claimant

Versus

1. The Chief Managing Director, Air India ltd., 113, Airline House, Gurudwara Rakabganj Road, New Delhi-110001.

2. IAL Airport Services Ltd. Safdarjung Airport, New Delhi-110003.

…Managements/respondents

Award 06.10.2026

Item No.- 06 Present: None for the claimants. Sh. Gautam Dutta and Ms. Shalvi Sinha, Ld. ARs for management-1 (Air India Ltd.). Record perused. Affidavits of evidence of four out of five claimants had been filed by the Ld. AR for the claimants on 27.07.2023. During the course of proceedings, one of the claimants, Sh. Ravinder Kumar, had passed away. The counsel for the claimants had submitted that he was not able to contact the legal heirs of the deceased claimant and, at his request, proceedings qua Late Sh. Ravinder Kumar were abated.

Page 1 of 2

However, as no one on behalf of the claimants has appeared today, the matter is adjourned to 12.01.2027 for workmen’s evidence.

Presiding Officer CGIT-cum-labour court-II At 01:00 PM Sh. Gopal, AR for the claimants, appeared and stated that he was not able to contact the other four claimants as well and requested that a No Dispute Award be accordingly passed. Record perused. A reference had been sent by the appropriate government to this Tribunal on 15.04.2019 for adjudication in the following words: "Whether the action of the Management of M/s IAL Airport Services Ltd. under Air India Ltd. (Principal Employer) Deihi in terminating the services of S/Shri Anil Kumar Rathore w.e.f. 31.05.2009, Arvinder Pal Singh w.e.f 02.06.2009 and Ved Prakash, Ravinder Kumar, Deepak Bansal w.e.f. 05.06.2009 are proper, legal and justified? If not, what relief they are entitled to and from which date and what other directions are necessary in this regard?"

In pursuance of reference, claimants appeared and filed their claim statement. In rebuttal, written statement was filed. After completion of pleadings, issues were framed and the matter was at the stage of workmen’s evidence. However, as the AR for the claimants has submitted that he is unable to contact the claimants. In view of the above submission, a ‘No Dispute Award’ is accordingly passed in the present matter. A copy of this award be sent to the Appropriate Government for notification under Section 17 of the I.D. Act. The case file is consigned to the Record Room.

ATUL KUMAR GARG

Dated 06.10.2026

Presiding Officer

CGIT – cum – Labour Court – II

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead