Central Government Industrial Tribunal

CGIT2 Delhi Order dated 12.08.2026 passed in EPF Appeals on 12 August 2026

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENTINDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 2 DELHI; Appeal No. D-2/17/2026

M/s. Home and Facility Management …..Appellant Through:- Sh.Kumar Vikram, ld. counsel & Ms. Anita Dhar, A/R for the appellant.

Vs.

RPFC/APFC, Noida

…Respondent Through:- Sh. B.B. Pradhan, Ld. Counsel for the respondent. Order Dated:- 12.08.2026

Today, the matter is being taken up by way of mentioning by Ld. Counsel for the appellant who has moved an application seeking extension of time for compliance of order dated 02.07.2026 on account of financial hardship. Perusal of record reveals that this Tribunal vide order dated 02.07.2026 had directed the appellant to deposit the interest component within six weeks. However, it has been submitted by the Ld. Counsel for the appellant that the appellant establishment is facing financial hardship and not in a position to deposit the amount in the given time, and has sought an additional time of two weeks to comply with the order. Considering the submission of the appellant and in the interest of justice, the appellant is given an additional two weeks’ time to deposit the said amount by 25.08.2026 which is the date already fixed in the matter. A copy of this order be sent to both parties through email.

(Atul Kumar Garg) Presiding Officer

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT No. 2/EPFAT, DELHI

Page 1 of 4

D-2/19/2021 & D-2/05/2023 M/s Ghatak Security Services vs. APFC/RPFC, Noida.

Present: None for the appellant.

Sh. B.B. Pradhan, ld. counsel & Sh. Gurpreet Singh

for the respondent.

Order dated-12.08.2026

The A/R appearing for the respondent has submitted printouts of Form 24 for the year 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17. He was directed to sit with the registrar of this tribunal to apprise about the facts regarding number of employees during the relevant period and contribution paid by them and also the short payment due from the establishment.

After prolong deliberation of about two and half hours, it was apprised that nothing can be carved out on basis of the Form 24 regarding number of employees and their contribution paid during the period of enquiry.

Ld. Counsel for the appellant is not present. Let the matter be fixed for final arguments on 02.09.2026. Notice be given tl ld. Counsel for the appellant through email.

Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT No. 2/EPFAT, DELHI

D-2/22/2022 M/s Jaypee HealthCare Ltd.

Page 2 of 4

…. Appellant Through:- Sh. Aniket Singh, ld. counsel for the appellant. Vs. APFC/RPFC, Noida

…. Respondent Through:- Sh. Avneesh Meena, A/R for the respondent.

Order dated-12.08.2026

The A/R appearing for the respondent prays to adjourn the matter stating that the earlier engaged counsel Sh. Kaushik Kumar Dey has been de-paneled from the list of counsels for the respondent department and department is going to appoint a new counsel in due course after seeking necessary approval. Considering submission of respondent and in the interest of justice, adjournment is allowed. List the matter on 08.09.2026 for final arguments.

Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENTINDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 2 DELHI; Appeal No. D-2/12/2025 M/s. Shreya Construction

.…. Appellant Through:- None for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Meerut

…. Respondent Through:- Sh. Narender Kumar, ld. counsel for the Respondent. Order Dated:-12.08.2026

Page 3 of 4

Today the case is listed for final arguments, however, ld. Counsel for the respondent submits that Sh. Prakash Kumar, ld. Counsel for the appellant has informed him that he will be seeking an adjournment and thus will not be appearing today.

Perusal of the record reveals that since last two dates ld. Counsel for the appellant has been seeking adjournment for one pretext or another. Therefore, adjournment is granted as a last chance with a specific direction to appear on the next date of hearing and address the arguments otherwise a cost of Rs.10,000/- shall be imposed upon him along with closing his right to address the final arguments. List the matter on 01.09.2026 for final arguments. A copy of this order be sent to the ld. Counsel for appellant through email.

(Atul Kumar Garg) Presiding Officer

Page 4 of 4

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead