CGIT2 Delhi Order dated 07.08.2026 passed in EPF Appeals except item no. 1 of the cause list which is uploaded separately on 7 August 2026

Misc. application in Appeal No. D-2/41/2024 M/s. Bhagpat Industries Ltd. .…. Appellant Through:- Sh. Arvind Kumar, ld. counsel for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Meerut

…. Respondent Through:- Sh. S.N. Mahanta, ld. counsel for the respondent Order Dated:-07.08.2026

Ld. counsel for the appellant has pressed his misc. application filed on behalf of the appellant under section 151 CPC for seeking the direction for de-attachment of the property by modification of the order dated 23.06.2025 passed by this tribunal.

The appellant’s contention is that his appeal was disposed by this tribunal vide order dated 23.06.2025 remanding back the matter to the respondent for reconsideration and passing the order afresh. Thereafter, respondent has passed an order dated 30.03.2026 under Section 7 A of the EPF & MP Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’) whereby the liability of the appellant was reduced from Rs. 53,15,308/- to Rs. 17,64,850/-. Subsequent thereto, the appellant deposited the said amount of Rs.17,64,850/-. However, the property attached pursuant to the orders passed by the respondent has still not been de-attached, despite several requests made by the appellant to the respondent authority.

Ld. counsel for the respondent has rebutted the aforesaid submissions of ld. counsel for the appellant, stating that, subsequent to the passing of the order dated 30.03.2026 under Section 7A of the Act, the respondent has also passed two orders dated 21.07.2026 and 23.07.2026, whereby amounts of Rs. 31,02,884/- and Rs. 32,66,114/- have been assessed under Sections 7Q and 14B of the Act, respectively, and the appellant is liable to pay the same.

In response thereto, ld. counsel for the appellant submitted that he had not received copies of the orders passed under Sections 14B and 7Q of the Act. Accordingly, copies of the said orders were supplied to him during the course of hearing.

Without going into the merits of the application at this stage, it would be appropriate to peruse the record of the respondent pertaining to the orders passed under Sections 14B and 7Q of the Act. Accordingly, the respondent is directed to produce the complete record pertaining to the orders passed under Sections 14B and 7Q of the Act on 11.08.2026. The office of the respondent shall be informed about the production of the aforesaid record through email.

M/s. Shivalik Prints

. …. Appellant Through:- None for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Faridabad

…. Respondent Through:- Sh.B. B. Pradhan, ld. counsel for the respondent Order Dated:-07.08.2026

Office has received a communication from ld. counsel for the appellant requesting for an adjournment showing his inability to appear today on account of ongoing heavy rainfall. In the interest of justice, prayer to grant adjournment is allowed. List the matter on 17.08.2026 for final arguments.

Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)

M/s. International Hospital Ltd.

Appellant Through:- Sh. K.K. Pandey, ld. counsel for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Noida

Respondent Through:- Sh. Aman Prakash, A/R for the respondent Order Dated:-07.08.2026

Ld. counsel appearing for the appellant as well as the A/R appearing for the respondent requested for an adjournment stating that their arguing counsels Sh. Anil Bhatt and Sh. Chakradhar Panda are unable to appear today due to ongoing heavy rainfall. In the interest of justice, adjournment granted. Put up on 24.08.2026 for final arguments.

M/s. Akasva Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

.…. Appellant Through:- None for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Gurugram

…. Respondent Through:- Sh. Prakhar Pushp, proxy counsel (For Sh. B.K. Tamber, ld. counsel ) for the respondent Order Dated:-07.08.2026

Proxy counsel appearing for the respondent requested for an adjournment stating that main counsel Sh. B. K. Tamber is unable to appear today due to ongoing heavy rainfall. Office has also reported that Sh. S.K. Gupta, ld. counsel for the appellant has also requested for an adjournment. In the interest of justice, adjournment granted. List the matter on 17.08.2026 for final arguments.

M/s. Balaji Manpower Recruitment Pvt. Ltd. .…. Appellant Through:- None for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Faridabad

…. Respondent Through:- Sh. B. B. Pradhan, ld. counsel for the respondent Order Dated:-07.08.2026

Office has received a communication from ld. counsel for the appellant requesting for an adjournment showing his inability to appear today on account of ongoing heavy rainfall. In the interest of justice, prayer to grant adjournment is allowed. List the matter on 17.08.2026 for final arguments.

Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)

M/s. Ahresty India Pvt. Ltd.

… Appellant Through:- Ms. Muskan Kaushik, ld. counsel for the appellant.

Vs.

RPFC/APFC, Gurgaon (West) …Respondent Through:- None for the Respondent. Order Dated:-07.08.2026

Registry has placed this appeal before me stating that inadvertently on 20.07.2026, the appeal was listed for 16.08.2026 which will be a ‘Sunday’ in place of 06.08.2026. He also submitted that this appeal had been listed on 06.08.2026 in the cause list, though, counsel for both the parties could not appear due to heavy rain but both had communicated about their difficulty for not appearing. Considering the fact that this appeal had been listed yesterday and both the parties had communicated this tribunal about their difficulty and the fact that the appeal is to be listed for 16.08.2026 inadvertently which is a Sunday, this appeal be listed on the next day i.e. 17.08.2026. Office is directed to communicate this order to both the parties.