Central Government Industrial Tribunal

CGIT2 Delhi Order dated 22.07.2026 passed in EPF Appeals on 22 July 2026

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENTINDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 2 DELHI; Appeal No. D-2/05/2026 & D-2/06/2026 M/s. Webtech International Machineries .…. Appellant Through:- Sh. Ravi Ranjan Tiwari, ld. counsel for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Faridabad

…. Respondent Through:- Sh. B. B. Pradhan, ld. counsel for the respondent Order Dated:-22.07.2026

These are two appeals filed by the appellant against the impugned order passed by the respondent under Section 14B & 7 Q of the EPF & MP Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’) for two different periods on 05.02.2026 wherein an amount of Rs.23,06,369/- & Rs.10,13,026/- has been assessed as damages and Rs.17,30,955/- & Rs.5,06,752/- has been assessed as interest for belated payment of EPF dues.

At the outset, it is important to mention here that counsel for the appellant herein has stated that in the last order, his surname was wrongly written as ‘Mishra’ instead of ‘ Tiwari’. Let it be corrected to the extent that in order dated 01.06.2026, name of the appellant’s counsel be read as ‘Sh. Ravi Ranjan Tiwari’ instead of ‘Sh. Ravi Ranjan Mishra’.

Counsel for the respondent seeks time to file reply of both the appeals stating that he has sent the comments for approval of the respondent authority. Since, the comments have not been received after approval, he seeks adjournment. Let the matter be fixed for filing of reply to the appeals within two weeks. He is directed to furnish the advance copy of the reply to ld. counsel for the appellant. List the matter on 19.08.2026.

(Atul Kumar Garg) Presiding Officer

Page 1 of 2

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENTINDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, No. 2 DELHI; Appeal No. D-2/11/2022 M/s. OPPO Mobile India Pvt. Ltd.

Appellant Through:- Sh. Rajan Jha, ld. counsel for the appellant Vs. APFC/RPFC, Noida

Respondent Through:- Sh. S.N. Mahanta, ld. counsel & Sh. Prem

Narayan Singh, A/R for the Respondent. Order Dated:-22.07.2026

Final arguments in the matter heard and concluded. The trial court record comprising of 873 pages of the communication side and 82 pages of noting side is retained and kept with the appeal file. The matter is reserved for pronouncement of order.

(Atul Kumar Garg) Presiding Officer

BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT No. 2/EPFAT, DELHI

D-2/10/2024 M/s National Institute of Open Schooling. …. Appellant Through:- Sh. B.K Singh & Sh. Sunil Srivastava, Ld. Counsel for the appellant. Vs. APFC/RPFC, Noida

…. Respondent Through:- Ms. Santwana Agarwal, ld. counsel for the respondent.

Order dated-22.07.2026

Ld. counsel for both the parties submitted that they have filed the written arguments. List the matter on 20.08.2026 for consideration of the same.

Atul Kumar Garg (Presiding Officer)

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead